If you want to make sure all your data had been copied into backup nodes
then you need to change synchronization mode to FULL_SYNC [1]
Thanks,
Amir
[1]
https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/primary-and-backup-copies#section-synchronous-and-asynchronous-backups
On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 8:14 AM monste
Rebalancing is a process when a node joins or leaves (in case backup is
turned on) a cluster, data will be rebalanced within a cluster to make a
fair distribution. It's applicable only for partitioned caches. But you
have replicated cache and it's out of your case.
Thanks,
Amir
On Jul 8, 2018 4:0
Hi,
Can you please show a code snippet? Small reproducer would be even better.
Thanks,
Amir
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 6:20 AM the_palakkaran wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a service from which I create a singleton IgniteQueue. I can get
> ignite instance using @IgniteInstanceResouce inside my service bu
Hi,
Can you give more details like Ignite configuration, how many server and
client nodes do you have, how are they deployed etc.
Thanks,
Amir
On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 10:25 AM the_palakkaran wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried scaling ignite with 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 500 threads for 1M gets.
> The resul
Hi Mikael,
1. This is just a warning informing you that Ignite's object serialization
will differ from yours Externalizable implementation. By default Ignite
will serialize all fields in object and if you want to customize then you
need implement Binarylizable interface or set custom serializer as
Please check this
> example on github:
> https://github.com/ezhuravl/ignite-eclipselink-example
>
> Evgenii
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
>
--
Sincerely Yours Amir Akhmedov
on is why do you need SQL if you are using only key based
> search? You can make exactly the same using Java Cache API.
>
> 2. You can leave Externalizable implementation in the class, it won't hurt.
>
> 3. Please check bullet #1, if you don't want indexes then you don't need
> create them.
>
> Thanks,
> Amir
>
>
>
--
Sincerely Yours Amir Akhmedov
You need to register a bean as follow
Please check the link a sent you earlier it has tests with all
required configurations. It can serve as a good example.
Hi Pim,
Can you please provide more details on your issue?
1. What is the issue and what is the expected behavior?
2. Server and client configurations
3. It would be nice to have a small reproducer for better understanding.
Thanks,
Amir
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 2:19 PM, Pim D wrote:
> Update:
>
tring[] args)
>
> {
>
>
>
> Ignite ignite = Ignition.start();
>
> CacheConfiguration cfg= new
> CacheConfiguration("catCache");
>
>
>
> cfg.setCacheMode(CacheMode.REPLICATED);
>
> cfg.setSqlEscapeAll(true);
>
> cfg.setSqlSchema("PUBLIC");
>
> cfg.setIndexedTypes(Integer.class,Cat.class);
>
> try(IgniteCache cache =
> ignite.getOrCreateCache(cfg))
>
> {
>
> for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {
>
> cache.put(i, new Cat(i + 1,"Fluffy"));
>
> }/*
>
> SqlFieldsQuery sql = new SqlFieldsQuery("select * from
> catCache");
>
> try (QueryCursor> cursor = cache.query(sql)) {
>
> for (List row : cursor)
>
> System.out.println("cat=" + row.get(0));
>
> }*/
>
> }
>
> System.out.print("Got It!");
>
>
>
> }}
>
> Thanks,
>
> *Mike Williams*
>
>
>
--
Sincerely Yours Amir Akhmedov
t;
>
>
> try(IgniteCache cache =
> ignite.getOrCreateCache(cfg))
>
> {
>
> try (IgniteDataStreamer stmr =
> ignite.dataStreamer("CAT")) {
>
> for (int i = 0; i < 1_000_000; i++)
>
>
I'm planning to start working on this ticket in couple of days, hopefully
will be implemented soon.
On Feb 13, 2018 6:06 PM, "Michael André Pearce"
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I just filled out the survey from the website and it reminded me of one
> short coming of Apache ignite still that we some times hit
are using TcpDiscoveryJdbcIpFinder for TcpDiscoverySpi, but
> with different datasource (database table and sever different.)
> Is this approach possible?
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
>
--
Sincerely Yours Amir Akhmedov
Hi Rick,
In Ignite cache name is used as a database schema and a cache value type as
a table name. So, in your case you should execute
select * from "igniteCache".STRING to get your cache data.
I would recomend you to run your Ignite instance with
-DIGNITE_H2_DEBUG_CONSOLE=true parameter so you c
Hi,
I think the answer to your question is no rather than yes. @QuerySqlField
has a field target type and a field in interface is public, static and
final.
Thanks,
Amir
* Friday, March 23, 2018 1:59 PM
> *To:* user@ignite.apache.org
> *Subject:* RE: Get all data of one cache in Ignite without creating a new
> ignite node
>
>
>
> Hi Amir
>
>
>
> I use the method recommended by you, and that works well.
>
> My testing code
Hi Denis,
I had a similar logs before and I can confirm I got them when enabled
"debug" level but the log level "severe" was really confusing.
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018, 8:52 AM Denis Mekhanikov wrote:
> Neeraj,
>
> You probably enabled debug logging on the following package:
> *org.apache.ignite.spi
Hi Anmol,
You statements are correct.
On Sep 3, 2016 05:02, "Anmol Rattan" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Wanted to understand difference between expiration policy and eviction.
>
> 1. Expiration is a time base policy which will remove entry from cache
> older than configured time duration. And will it only
fields of entity ?
>
> ex :
>
> select value as value, count(*) as count from Person where value = ? group
> by value
>
> Thanks
>
--
Sincerely Yours Amir Akhmedov
19 matches
Mail list logo