Re: Ignite Single Node vs Cluster of Nodes

2018-04-05 Thread Denis Mekhanikov
Hi!

If you add more nodes to your cluster, you'll get performance boost,
because queries
will be executed in a distributed manner.
But this boost will be noticeable only starting from some particular data
volume, because
distributed query execution is associated with some overhead.

You will also get higher durability, if you configure backups for
partitions.
In this case you will be protected from data loss, when some nodes are
failing.

Denis

чт, 5 апр. 2018 г. в 10:43, kotamrajuyashasvi :

> Hi
>
> I would like to know the added advantages of using Cluster of Nodes instead
> of a single node(single node is sufficient for my data volume) in my use
> case . All the operations are sql queries. And if I use a cluster of nodes,
> the result set of a query will always be present on a single node(due to
> affinitykey set. We cannot change the affinitykey as we also perform join
> queries. Even join queries result set also will be on a single node). Also
> if we did use cluster of nodes we will not be using more than 10 nodes.
> Will
> there be any advantage if we use cluster of nodes instead of a single node?
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
>


Ignite Single Node vs Cluster of Nodes

2018-04-05 Thread kotamrajuyashasvi
Hi

I would like to know the added advantages of using Cluster of Nodes instead
of a single node(single node is sufficient for my data volume) in my use
case . All the operations are sql queries. And if I use a cluster of nodes,
the result set of a query will always be present on a single node(due to
affinitykey set. We cannot change the affinitykey as we also perform join
queries. Even join queries result set also will be on a single node). Also
if we did use cluster of nodes we will not be using more than 10 nodes. Will
there be any advantage if we use cluster of nodes instead of a single node?



--
Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/