Bryce,
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 1:44 AM, Bryce bryc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have been looking at performance options for Neo4j as presently I have
been observing a number of performance issues. I am still investigating
the
way to get the best performance out of what I am doing, and one
Hi!
2011-09-01 03:29, Linan Wang:
2, does index operation add/remove/modify threadsafe, don't need
lock/transaction?
3, does it simple property writing operations also need to be wrapped
inside transaction? if so, in the imdb exmaple
tutor/domain/MovieImpl.java underlyingNode.setProperty is
Any thoughts on the matter ?
It scares me that the database can stop processing requests like that,
unless I am doing something very illegal and wrong.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Dima Gutzeit.
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Dima Gutzeit dima.gutz...@mailvision.comwrote:
Here is the
Hi everybody,
What are Neo4J forecasts about Tinker Pop's Frames and Blueprints
frameworks, now there is Spring Data Graph framework?
I saw that Neo4J guys are working on both projects, so do you have any
preference for using one framework rather than the other?
Michel.
Michel,
IMHO the Spring Data Graph is a much broader approach to the problem,
although it brings with it more dependencies. I guess it is a matter of
choice. I would go for Spring Data Graph personally.
Cheers,
/peter neubauer
GTalk: neubauer.peter
Skype peter.neubauer
Phone
Hi anders,
thanks for the clarification.
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Anders Nawroth and...@neotechnology.com wrote:
Hi!
2011-09-01 03:29, Linan Wang:
2, does index operation add/remove/modify threadsafe, don't need
lock/transaction?
3, does it simple property writing operations also
Hi!
All modifying operations need to be performed inside a transaction. In
most cases it makes sense to perform multiple operations in a single
transaction. For example in a web application it may be a good fit to
wrap the handling of one request in a transaction. So if a method
doesn't
Note that Gremlin is supported by Spring Data Graph, it's mentioned
here: http://www.springsource.org/node/3208
/anders
2011-09-02 11:05, Peter Neubauer skrev:
Michel,
IMHO the Spring Data Graph is a much broader approach to the problem,
although it brings with it more dependencies. I guess
hi
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Anders Nawroth
and...@neotechnology.com wrote:
Hi!
All modifying operations need to be performed inside a transaction. In
most cases it makes sense to perform multiple operations in a single
transaction. For example in a web application it may be a good
Hi,
I'm currently testing Spring Data Graph, with a focus on polyglot
persistence use cases, in order to give a short presentation at Spring User
Group in Paris on September.
This email follows my previous discussion with Michael Hunger (pasted
below), and I have some questions/suggestions:
1-
Damn, this is a really good catch. I think it should be rather simple to
wait with committing the transaction until the full response is generated.
I'll look into it.
In general, and as has been mentioned several times before, we obviously
need to look at how we could stream the batch
Hi!
Seems like the node and index modifications belong in the same
transaction, to make sure any modifications to nodes are always
reflected in the indexes as well. Otherwise they could get out of sync
if your application crashes after the commit of the first,
node-modifying transaction.
it
great. i thought transaction only applies to nodes operations. seems
it also including indexing. it's handy!
other 9 questions? :)
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Anders Nawroth
and...@neotechnology.com wrote:
Hi!
Seems like the node and index modifications belong in the same
transaction, to
Hi all,
I am glad to announce the availability of our first milestone in the Neo4j
1.5 Boden Bord release, see
http://blog.neo4j.org/2011/09/announcing-neo4j-boden-bord-15m01-ga.html
for the blog. After a summer break in our regular release cycle, we hope to
get back into the swing of things, I
Hi,
I'm starting a new project and I have a doubt:
The software itself will not be sold, but it's output will be used for
commercial purposes. Do I need to purchase Neo4j Advanced or am I allowed to
keep with Neo4j Community version?
Thanks in advance.
--
View this message in context:
Hi there,
if you are not distributing the software and only using the output artifacts
(your customers not touching your system) then AGPL is totally fine. Happy
hacking!
Cheers,
/peter neubauer
GTalk: neubauer.peter
Skype peter.neubauer
Phone +46 704 106975
LinkedIn
Hi,
My thoughts on the matter.
Frames is bare-bones simple and the library is tiny. If you simply want to do
the following, then Frames is cool:
1. Use annotated interfaces to define a Graph-to-Object mapping. (at
the cost of Java reflection)
2. Use your objects as a way to
Oh, I didn't see this:
(use twitter example: my followees' followers)
Then the query I provided in the previous email:
g.v(1).out('livesIn').sideEffect{city =
it}.back(2).out.out.filter{it.out('livesIn').next().equals(city)}.groupCount(age){it.age}.groupCount(gender){it.gender}
18 matches
Mail list logo
