Re: [Neo4j] CQL find by name
In my opinion, the current syntax reminds me of SQL, which is a good thing. All the newbies like me can easily wrap their head around the concepts, without much problem. Since you can't do an actual assignment in Cypher (please correct me if i am wrong), an equal sign clearly means comparison only. ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Re: [Neo4j] CQL find by name
Actually they map to two different calls of the neo4j core API.
The first one is a exact lookup for the value.
The second one takes an arbitrary query string and executes it against an
index, so it is much more powerful.
(But also dependend on the index-provider)
Main difference is that the query string has to be parsed by the index.
And around parameters, first one is better if you want to have the lookup
variable fixed.
start node=node:index(key={param})
start node=node:index({param})
Cheers
Michael
Am 01.12.2011 um 03:56 schrieb yobi:
I have seen both this:
START root=node:node_auto_index(name = 'FileRoot')
and this used:
START root=node:node_auto_index('name: FileRoot')
Isn't the second one more appropriate since the first one could be mixed up
with an assignment and the second one looks more like a key:value pair. More
simple to get and you don't have to change syntax style when you are using
*.
START root=node:node_auto_index('name: FileRoot*')
Correct me if I am missing something.
--
View this message in context:
http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/CQL-find-by-name-tp3550446p3550446.html
Sent from the Neo4j Community Discussions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
___
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
