Re: [Neo4j] Spring Data Neo4J vs. Tinker Pop's Frames/BluePrints?

2011-09-02 Thread Peter Neubauer
Michel, IMHO the Spring Data Graph is a much broader approach to the problem, although it brings with it more dependencies. I guess it is a matter of choice. I would go for Spring Data Graph personally. Cheers, /peter neubauer GTalk: neubauer.peter Skype peter.neubauer Phone

Re: [Neo4j] Spring Data Neo4J vs. Tinker Pop's Frames/BluePrints?

2011-09-02 Thread Anders Nawroth
Note that Gremlin is supported by Spring Data Graph, it's mentioned here: http://www.springsource.org/node/3208 /anders 2011-09-02 11:05, Peter Neubauer skrev: Michel, IMHO the Spring Data Graph is a much broader approach to the problem, although it brings with it more dependencies. I guess

Re: [Neo4j] Spring Data Neo4J vs. Tinker Pop's Frames/BluePrints?

2011-09-02 Thread Marko Rodriguez
Hi, My thoughts on the matter. Frames is bare-bones simple and the library is tiny. If you simply want to do the following, then Frames is cool: 1. Use annotated interfaces to define a Graph-to-Object mapping. (at the cost of Java reflection) 2. Use your objects as a way to