> if you're ok with the overhead, that's the simplest solution from the users
> POV.
>
> Thanks,
> James
>
> [1] https://phoenix.apache.org/secondary_indexing.html#
> Consistency_Guarantees
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Matthew Van Wely <
> mv
All,
I would like some guidance on LOCAL vs TRANSACTIONAL indexes and I
cannot quite get the details I need from the Phoenix site:
https://phoenix.apache.org/secondary_indexing.htm
Transactional Tables
transactional tables with secondary indexes potentially lowers your
availability of being
against various write failure scenarios.
>
> Thanks,
> James
>
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Matthew Van Wely <
> mvanw...@salesforce.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks James, knowing that there are no race conditions (or very
>> unlikely) from the same client on a m
Thanks James, knowing that there are no race conditions (or very
unlikely) from the same client on a mutable table is really helpful.
Thx,
--Matt
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 4:26 PM, James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org>
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 7:22 PM, Matthew Van We
