Re: [slf4j-user] [POLL] Requiring JDK 1.5 for SLF4J
yes Ceki Gulcu wrote: Do you accept SLF4J dropping JDK 1.3 compatibility and require JDK 1.5 instead? ___ user mailing list user@slf4j.org http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Re: [slf4j-user] [POLL] Requiring JDK 1.5 for SLF4J
yes On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Erik van Oosten e.vanoos...@grons.nlwrote: yes Ceki Gulcu wrote: Do you accept SLF4J dropping JDK 1.3 compatibility and require JDK 1.5 instead? ___ user mailing list user@slf4j.org http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user ___ user mailing list user@slf4j.org http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Re: [slf4j-user] [POLL] Requiring JDK 1.5 for SLF4J
* Ceki Gulcu wrote, On 27/03/09 04:16: Do you accept SLF4J dropping JDK 1.3 compatibility and require JDK 1.5 instead? If you respond, please do so on the u...@slf4j mailing list. +1 davidv ___ user mailing list user@slf4j.org http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Re: [slf4j-user] [POLL] Requiring JDK 1.5 for SLF4J
yes Ceki Gulcu c...@qos.ch wrote: Do you accept SLF4J dropping JDK 1.3 compatibility and require JDK 1.5 instead? ___ user mailing list user@slf4j.org http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Re: [slf4j-user] [POLL] Requiring JDK 1.5 for SLF4J
Ceki Gulcu schrieb: Hello all, SLF4J users have been asking for varags support for a long time. See [...] Do you accept SLF4J dropping JDK 1.3 compatibility and require JDK 1.5 instead? If you respond, please do so on the u...@slf4j mailing list. Hi Ceki, I repeat my +1 from http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31#c13 Cheers, Christian ___ user mailing list user@slf4j.org http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Re: [slf4j-user] [POLL] Requiring JDK 1.5 for SLF4J
+1 On Mar 26, 2009, at 1:16 PM, Ceki Gulcu wrote: Hello all, SLF4J users have been asking for varags support for a long time. See http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31 for more details. The plan is to add varags support in SLF4J version 1.6 to be released later this year, possibly in October 2009. The idea is extremely simple. We would replace methods such as: // in current API public void debug(String msgFormat, Object[] argArray); with: // proposed API for SLF4J 1.6.0 public void debug(String msgFormat, Object... arg); Interestingly enough, the proposed change is perfectly compatible with existing code. In particular, code compiled against SLF4J 1.5.6 or earlier will run fine against SLF4J 1.6.0 and vice versa, that is client code compiled with SLF4J 1.6.0 will run fine with SLF4J 1.5.6 and earlier. The only problem is that the varargs notation requires JDK 1.5. Thus, we are faced with the question of requiring JDK 1.5 instead of JDK 1.3 in SLF4J. Do you accept SLF4J dropping JDK 1.3 compatibility and require JDK 1.5 instead? If you respond, please do so on the u...@slf4j mailing list. This poll is open for 3 months starting from today, March the 26th of 2009. Many thanks in advance for your feedback. -- Ceki Gülcü Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for Java. http://logback.qos.ch ___ user mailing list user@slf4j.org http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user ___ user mailing list user@slf4j.org http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Re: [slf4j-user] [POLL] Requiring JDK 1.5 for SLF4J
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:16, Ceki Gulcu c...@qos.ch wrote: Do you accept SLF4J dropping JDK 1.3 compatibility and require JDK 1.5 instead? If you respond, please do so on the u...@slf4j mailing list. yes ___ user mailing list user@slf4j.org http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Re: [slf4j-user] [POLL] Requiring JDK 1.5 for SLF4J
Ceki Gulcu wrote: Do you accept SLF4J dropping JDK 1.3 compatibility and require JDK 1.5 instead? If you respond, please do so on the u...@slf4j mailing list. Yes. Thanks. -- Regards, Farrukh Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com ___ user mailing list user@slf4j.org http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
