Thank you for your advice. I ended up also looking at
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/16747902/setting-trust-store-programatically-in-activemqsslconnectionfactory-seems-to-fai
and also
Hi,
I need to configure activemq-client not to perform broker cerificate
validation. I need this for testing purposes, because I need to test the
system over SSL, but I do not yet have certificate distribution solved.
In Artemis, with artemis-jms-client, there is verifyHost=false and
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Justin Bertram wrote:
> Ultimately I believe the decision is in the hands of the ActiveMQ PMC [1].
>
Where can I find a list of PMC members for ActiveMQ? The closest I got to
it is http://activemq.apache.org/team.html
--
Jiri Daněk
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 7:29 PM, Justin Bertram wrote:
> > I believe it's because it's not implemented.
>
> Agreed. It looks to me like only the publish packets are intercepted
I've been wondering, why are they called "packets"? They are not the IP
packets, so why reuse
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> This test is currently failing, but I didn't see it hanging anywhere.
>
>
> Perhaps we should add it to the ignore list until it's fixed.
>
I am attaching my output of `mvn -Pfast-tests -Pextra-tests install`.
On Tuesday, June 28, 2016, Jiri Danek <jda...@redhat.com> wrote:
> After increasing the [memory] limit, I got stuck at a test repeatedly
> printing
>
> javax.jms.IllegalStateException: The Session is closed
> at
> org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQSession.checkClosed(
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:40 AM, Justin Bertram wrote:
> It's not working because that feature is not implemented in the broker as
> I stated in a previous email. There's no way to get it working unless you
> modify the broker to support it.
>
I've submitted a Feature
After somewhat lengthy struggle I still did not manage to run Artemis tests
in a VM. I'd like to ask if there is anybody who managed to run the tests
and I would like to ask for suggestions what could be causing the tests to
fail for me. Is there something obvious I need to do but I am not doing?
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 9:44 AM, siddutta wrote:
> I wish to run an experiment in which the publisher loses connection with
> the
> broker and then enqueues them in its own queue and then when it regains
> connectivity it send s all its queued messages to the broker.