Re: Pager coverage on 12/20???

A rogue email from the 20th century - I didn’t know Pagers were still in use! > On 18 Dec 2017, at 14:52, > wrote: > > Can any of you cover pager on 12/20 from 9am - 11am EDT? I have a doc > appointment that I

Re: Duplicate messages received with ActiveMQ 5.13.2

> On 1 Aug 2017, at 15:36, tpavelka wrote: > > It looks like the check for networkSubscription is there for a reason, > described in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-2327 > The commit 6c5732b also mentions: > > /key is not to conduit proxy/proxy consumers b/c the

Re: scheduler message deliver immediately

I mean start the broker outside your code, run it standalone :) > On 27 Oct 2016, at 10:05, CallMeXYZ wrote: > > how can i get scheduler support without broker? I thought it should be > configured inside broker > > > > -- > View this message in context: >

Re: scheduler message deliver immediately

seems like you either have a running broker from a previous test - or you are creating multiple brokers from changing the config. Search for the activemq process and kill it. I might be easier initially to not create an embedded broker, but start it as a separate process > On 27 Oct 2016, at

Re: scheduler message deliver immediately

Can’t spot any gottchas. Could you set the Scheduler directory for your embedded broker - just to check its actually being created ? - see https://github.com/apache/activemq/blob/master/activemq-unit-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/broker/scheduler/JobSchedulerTestSupport.java#L100 for

Re: Activemq not listening to 61613

The address [::0] is a new one on me in uri="stomp+nio://[::0]:61613 ” - did you mean [::] (without the trailing zero?) I would try stomp+nio://0.0.0.0:61613 - which is IPv4 - but usually the platform (Windows/Linux) can handle dual

Re: ActiveMQ data directory

> On 5 Apr 2016, at 05:23, Natarajan, Rajeswari > wrote: > > > Hi, > > I have below questions/assumptions . Please let me know if they are correct > > the data directory size (along with Kaha DB)in activemq increase linearly > with number of (same size)

Re: request-reply broken on duplex network (5.12.1) ?

Be interested to see if it works if you remove the dynamicallyIncludedDestinations ? > On 10 Feb 2016, at 19:23, felixehm wrote: > > Hi, > > before opening an issue, here's what we have encountered on our production > system: > > Scenario: > Given two brokers A and B in a

Re: How fileCursor works? AMQ5.9.1

IIRC filecursor will only be used for non-persistent messages and messages sent to a topic with no durable subscriber: i.e. for any messages that can’t be stored in the message store. Is it possible you are using persistent messages ? > On 3 Feb 2016, at 05:58, fengcanyue <153133...@qq.com>

Re: ActimeMQ Client's thread management

> On 13 Jan 2016, at 03:30, itelleria wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm analysing how ActiveMQ client manages the threads to send and receive > JMS messages and I have some questions that I would like to ask. > > As far as I've understood when I call

Re: Message Group rebalancing

Nice feature - submit a JIRA! > On 11 Nov 2015, at 14:28, Tim Bain wrote: > > I've never heard of such a feature (but maybe someone else here has), but I > think it would be a great addition if it doesn't exist. So if you don't > get a response within a couple days, I

Re: Duplex isn't working connecting an embedded broker to a external broker

This might help - https://github.com/apache/activemq/blob/master/activemq-unit-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/network/DuplexNetworkTest.java > On 6 Oct

Re: Advice for Scheduler refactor.

Nice! I like what you've done. I originally used ConcurrenthashMap - but found it a bit of a hog, would be interested if you find different? On 7 May 2015, at 19:58, Kevin Burton bur...@spinn3r.com wrote: On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 6:30 AM, Tim Bain tb...@alumni.duke.edu wrote: I agree with

Re: Why is MemoryMessageStore a map and not a queue… Re-implementing with a PriorityBlockingQueue

Its historical - probably at least 10 years old in origin. Only warning I would give is that ConcurrentHashMap can be slow and a memory hog for lots of inserts deletes - synchronisation around a HashMap may perform better - would be worth validating that though On 1 Apr 2015, at 20:57,

Re: ActiveMQ 5.11 Dynamic Camel Route updates

why happened with the authorization ? mtod mailto:m...@thetods.net 13 March 2015 04:02 I was able to get this working except for authorization. Thanks -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-5-11-Dynamic-Camel-Route-updates-tp4693120p4693136.html

Re: Sending directly to a queue doesn’t raise ActiveMQ.Advisory.Producer.Queue.

Good point - I think it's a bug - you can always turn advisories off if you don't want a flood of them. Can you raise an issue so it doesn't get forgotten? On 2 Feb 2015, at 17:53, Kevin Burton bur...@spinn3r.com wrote: This is by design as the second case creates an anonymous producer that

Re: GC of inactive destinations requires no consumers?

Thats correct On 29 Jan 2015, at 21:42, Kevin Burton bur...@spinn3r.com wrote: It seems the inactive destination code requires both an empty queue and *no* consumers on the queue? so if you have an empty queue, and at least 1 consumer listening to it, it will not be GCd.. is this

Re: Notification of connection down between broker and client?

You could drop into ActiveMQ specific code - cast you Connection to an ActiveMQConnection and add a TransportListener to get notifications of the underlying transport events see http://activemq.apache.org/maven/apidocs/org/apache/activemq/ActiveMQConnection.html and

Re: How long do I have to acknowledge() a message?

The broker holds state about unacknowledged messages - and will hold that state until either the broker shuts down or the client disappears. Remember that acknowleding a message will acknowledge all messages consumed by the client's Session. Depending on what your doing, you may want to use

Re: Should I use a session per thread or individual acknowledge?

Hi Kevin - that sounds good as a nice simple solution - session per thread. Kevin Burton mailto:bur...@spinn3r.com 11 June 2014 18:05 I need to acknowledge each message individually as they will take some time to process. I was thinking of creating on connection, and then a session per

Re: can a client refuse a message?

Beanstalkd might be a better fit for your use case - it's job based - and iirc allows the client to reject jobs On 3 Mar 2014, at 09:41, Li Li fancye...@gmail.com wrote: thank you. I want to know now is that to achieve my goal(as I described before), is it suitable to use activemq(or

Re: one queue per request

This kills performance - there is an overhead to Queue creation and Queues - even temporary queues. Create one Queue for responses - and route the appropriate message in your application. On 20 Apr 2012, at 23:12, Mohit Anchlia wrote: I have never done it this way but I see lot of references

Re: Embedded broker, non-persistent messages and store based cursor

Unfortunately - when you disable persistence in the broker, it also prevents any use of storage to disk. I suggest you don't set persistence to false and make sure the messages you send are non-persistent. You should then get the behaviour you want. On 10 Mar 2012, at 03:43, colomb wrote: We

Re: ActiveMQ stopping repeatedly because of SyncFailedException

Upgrade to 5.3.2 - I'd dig out the issue for you but my Internet connectivity is really poor. On 6 Jul 2011, at 14:28, casperjeff jam...@istreamfs.com wrote: Started about a week ago. Been running activeMQ 5.3.1 with no issues for months and months. Suddenly, about a week ago, activemq

Re: statisticsBrokerPlugin with Camel in Servicemix

have you tried sending a message to ActiveMQ.Statistics.Broker - to see if you get a response (you need to set the replyTo destination on the message) ? On 2 Jun 2011, at 21:13, john wrote: I'm running the fuse 4.2.0-fuse-02-00 release. It includes activemq 5.3.1 along with Camel 2.2 all

Re: New Twisted Python STOMP client: stompest

Awesome! On 1 Feb 2011, at 19:19, Roger Hoover wrote: Hi, If anyone's interested in a Twisted STOMP client for Python, we just open-sourced one: https://github.com/mozes/stompest It builds on top of the stomper library and is well tested and used in production with ActiveMQ and a limited

Re: ActiveMQ - failing over to another server

interesting - please log this as an issue On 31 Jan 2011, at 10:48, rholt wrote: in case anyone ever has issues like this i will post the issue found again as a new problem. essentially when a connecting system connects with failover:(tcp:IP:PORT) then things are fine. however when it

Re: Producer flow control question

Would need to see how you've configured the infamous JMSTemplate - to see what the problem is On 17 Dec 2010, at 16:44, maarten.dirkse wrote: Hi, It's often said that producer flow control (PFC) is one of the most misunderstood features of ActiveMQ, and I couldn't agree more. After what

Re: HermesJMS demo link is not resolving.

I think we'll need to remove the link - I'm not sure what happened to all the ActiveMQ stuff on codehaus? On 17 Dec 2010, at 15:27, rliguori wrote: This page (http://activemq.apache.org/hermes-jms.html) states, Mark Bucayan kindly submitted a Flash demo showing how to use ActiveMQ inside

Re: Message stuck on queue

For statistics - can you should be able to use wildcards - if you use '' as the destination name - what do you get ? On 10 Dec 2010, at 22:23, watcher wrote: An update so far. We stilll cant seem to find a resolution to this issue. We have noticed similar user having problems. See here.

Re: Concurrent consumers

Yes - you can have concurrent consumers - looks like you've fallen victim to prefetch subscription - http://activemq.apache.org/what-is-the-prefetch-limit-for.html I suggest you use a prefetch of 1 cheers, Rob Rob Davies follow me: http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http

Re: Quest for Job queue

You mean JMS Queue ;) On 7 Nov 2010, at 10:30, Norman Maurer wrote: Just use a JMX queue for this. It will do what you need out of box. Bye Norman 2010/11/7, Allan Kamau kamaual...@gmail.com: I am new to ActiveMQ and messaging as a whole. I am developing a parallized application the

Re: Scheduler failover in Master-Slave

The only way to do this currently is to use a SAN or GFS - see http://activemq.apache.org/shared-file-system-master-slave.html On 2 Nov 2010, at 08:42, werdex wrote: Hi! I am using AMQ_SCHEDULED_DELAY when sending a message to ActiveMQ and found that scheduler stores it data at

Re: Scheduler failover in Master-Slave

Yes - that would be possible - you can set the directory used for the scheduler database in the activemq XML configuration file On 2 Nov 2010, at 09:25, werdex wrote: Thx for reply! Maybe is it possible to continue to keep the messages in database (oracle,ms-sql) , but use shared file

Re: JDBC Master Slave approach with Journal for HA

You shouldn't use the high performance journal with JDBC Master/Slave - http://activemq.apache.org/jdbc-master-slave.html with the journal and JDBC database - messages are stored in the journal - and only the references to those messages are stored in the journal - which would be local to the

Re: Reg Managing Listeners

I'd look at advisory messages to do this - see http://activemq.apache.org/advisory-message.html On 25 Oct 2010, at 11:23, sudheer wrote: Hi, Please suggest how we manage various listeners listening on activemq topic? I have an administration job which keeps checking the status of all

Re: timeToLive with out of sync clocks

Have you looked at the timestampPlugin - http://activemq.apache.org/timestampplugin.html ? On 25 Oct 2010, at 06:04, simevans wrote: We are using activemq 5.3.2. We noticed our subscriber does not receive messages when the clock on the subscriber is out by more that the timeToLive that the

Re: Exceptions with shared nothing master/slave

eek! - do you have a test case you can reproduce this with ? On 19 Oct 2010, at 02:41, Marcel Jager wrote: HI, I've setup a master/slave configuration using the 'A Shared Nothing' deployment. I had two fresh ActiveMQ 5.4.1 deployment and two servers named activemqc and activemqd. I have

Re: KahaDB - log f

I did this a while ago too see if it would improve performance - it didn't so I ditched the code. Why do you want to do this? On 15 Sep 2010, at 18:02, nervousbadger wrote: We've decided that we will need to implement per-queue log files. Do you know if anyone has attempted this before?

Re: Correct way to build a mesh of brokers

That ordering issue is a pita - appologies - 5.4 should be out next week cheers, Rob On 26 Jul 2010, at 19:31, ripienaar wrote: ripienaar wrote: The configs for 5.3.2 is not compatible with 5.4, I'd say that renders 5.4 useless and I cannot test. Given the state of the

Re: What happens with Topic msgs if there is no subscriber? Postpone deletion?

You can do that - see SubscriptionRecoveryPolicy - http://activemq.apache.org/subscription-recovery-policy.html cheers, Rob Rob Davies follow me: http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I wrote this: http://www.manning.com/snyder

Re: How is the Message ID compiled

to complete the id. cheers, Rob Rob Davies follow me: http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I wrote this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ On 21 Jul 2010, at 11:15, Neil Pritchard wrote: Hi, I'm using ActiveMQ as an exchange

Re: Duplex and network fault.

Hi Eric, yes I think this is the case - I think we need to ensure that the old connection is destroyed when the new one joins cheers, Rob Rob Davies follow me: http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I wrote this: http

Re: Duplex and network fault.

when the new one joins cheers, Rob Rob Davies follow me: http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I wrote this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ On 21 Jul 2010, at 10:09, Eric-AWL wrote: I was wrong. here

Re: Confusion about How KahaDB works !!!

Hi charles - are you using transactions? On 1 Jul 2010, at 15:12, cmoulliard wrote: Hi, I'm confused and try to understand How ActiveMq works with KahaDB. My activemq broker 5.3.0 is configured to be non persistent and messages send are also delivered as NON persistent but KhaDB files

Re: KahaDB storage - corruption risk

Indexes in KahaDB have a replay log - so its very unlikely you will get a corrupted index On 1 Jul 2010, at 10:43, cmoulliard wrote: What are the risks that a client could be faced regarding to the kahadb storage (synchronisation of index, lost of index or data, ...) ? Is there a way to

Re: KahaDB and TOPIC problems

Firstly - upgrade to 5.3.2 - there are some minor bug fixes - but also performance enhancements. I would check that you don't have a durable subscriber in your system that was active at some point - but is no loner - you can use JMX to do this On 2 Jul 2010, at 09:51, RJtokenlanring wrote:

Re: JMX Pending queue size issue

Good catch Colin! - thanks for investigating it cheers, Rob Rob Davies follow me: http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I wrote this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ On 25 Jun 2010, at 17:33, Colin Goodheart-Smithe wrote: Hi

Re: Failover and updateClusterClients

Rob Davies follow me: http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/

Re: Differences between AMQ 4.1.1 and 5.3.2

I would use at least 5.3.2 - 5.x has a faster default persistent storage - but the main difference is there no overhead on the depth of Queues to broker memory. cheers, Rob Rob Davies follow me: http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http

Re: broker same or seperate jvm

Generally use the same JVM if you want to co-locate with your application/service - and you want the broker to only be available at the same time as your application/service :) cheers, Rob Rob Davies follow me: http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http

Re: ActiveMQ ignoring persistent=false

that looks like a bug that has crept back in - its created - but no data should be put in that directory cheers, Rob On 22 Jun 2010, at 08:25, paul.mckenzie wrote: I am using Active MQ (5.3.2) for integration testing my application. I have defined an active-mq broker in a spring config

Re: activeMQ broker for our useCases

the same broker can do both On 15 Jun 2010, at 05:08, radha_mit wrote: Should we have separate message brokers for persistent and non persistent messages or a same broker will do for both ? -- View this message in context:

Re: AMQ Persistence Store explanation

indexKeySize is the maximum size of a key used in a persistent hashmap used for indexes. Don't change this :) indexPageSize is the size of the page in the persistent hashmap - multiple pages are stored in a has bin. 4096 is the optimum size (or multiples of that) indexBinSize is the initial

Re: Message-Level Authorization between brokers?

Hi Jim, could you supply a patch ? - not sure I understand your use case - or why you would apply it only to networks ? thanks, Rob On 26 May 2010, at 01:45, Jim Lloyd wrote: I've done more research and I think I know better where ActiveMQ would support my desired feature, and it seems the

Re: Activemq comunication causes out of memory

is the activemq version the same on the client and the broker ? On 12 May 2010, at 11:48, dimitarn wrote: New one javax.jms.JMSException: Wire format negotiation timeout: peer did not send his wire format. 10:27:28,745 ERROR [STDERR] at

Re: Master/Slave mode - slave never taking over

Hi Rich, have you replicated the network connections in the master configuration into the slave configuration ? This is important. How did you stop the master ? - did you just kill it ? (this shouldn't be problem - but might help to identify where it is) You could try

Re: Activemq comunication causes out of memory

ok - can you try creating the MessageProducer only in the initialize() code and not close() it after every message send ? On 5 May 2010, at 09:37, dimitarn wrote: [CODE] @Override public void initialize() throws JMSException { connection = createConnection();

Re: My Benchmark stats

Awesome results! On 18 Apr 2010, at 15:37, Vibe from Boston wrote: I will be soon posting the benchmark stats on my blog, but I wanted to post it here. all on one meaty machine, Intel I7 64bit Windows server, 8GB ram. Client sends a message to nio based server [thru xsocket lib]. the nio

Open source pubcrawl Tuesday 20th April

Starting at 5.30pm here: http://www.mickeesonthewater.com/ Making way to Boston (or until I fall over) - all welcome :) cheers, Rob

Re: Topic Inheritance

Yes - ActiveMQ supports destination hierarchies - a '.' dot notation denotes an element in the name. To extend your example - say you had models too - to subscribe to all Ford cars - you would use ''. e.g. car.ford. You can use the '*' to subscribe to everything for So to subscribe to cars -

Re: ActiveMQ 5.3.0 cpu usage goes to zero

Tim - try 5.3.1 On 26 Mar 2010, at 20:16, TMcCabe wrote: Config file: broker xmlns=http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core; brokerName=localhost dataDirectory=${activemq.base}/data advisorySupport=false !-- The managementContext is used to configure how ActiveMQ

Re: Messages stuck in the queue

catching Throwable would be best. You wouldn't need to redeploy the JMS queue - just restart the client should do On 26 Mar 2010, at 16:40, Cristian Botiza wrote: When you say 'you miss an ack somewhere'...does this mean onMessage() throws an exception? I've had this problem before, I

Re: OutOfMemoryException in consumer

What happens if you run that code without the database piece ? Also - have you reduced your prefetch to 100 ? Are you receiving messages that aren't ObjectMessage types ? On 25 Mar 2010, at 00:24, Milan Tomic wrote: Memory consumed is growing slowly with a time... over 100 MB in one day

Re: ActiveMQ 5.3.0 Memory Usage - Connections

This could be due to https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2512 - could you try 5.3.1 ? On 25 Mar 2010, at 13:28, Pothier, Peter wrote: Hi, I finally figured out how to use jconsole remotely (I had a misunderstanding of what value to use in -Djava.rmi.server.hostname=host, using

Re: ActiveMQ 5.3.0 Memory Usage - Connections

be? Peter P -Original Message- From: Rob Davies [mailto:rajdav...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 9:39 AM To: users@activemq.apache.org Cc: Pothier, Peter Subject: Re: ActiveMQ 5.3.0 Memory Usage - Connections This could be due to https://issues.apache.org/activemq

Re: Strange problem

Hi Alex, could you try with the KahaDB persistence adaptor ? cheers, Rob On 23 Mar 2010, at 17:26, abosetti wrote: Hi all I am experiencing a strange problem. Every other time that I startup my tomcat server, I get the message SEVERE: IOException while loading persisted sessions:

Re: AMQ DataStore exception leading to Java.IO.EOFException

Yes - though make sure its KahaDB - there's an older store called Kaha - we aren't very good at thinking up new names! On 17 Mar 2010, at 01:15, Sebastian Rodriguez wrote: Do you guys think switching to Kaha Data Store could solve this issue ( = this issue is AmqDatastore specific?) On 16

Re: prefetchExtension off-by-1 for transacted consumers with prefetchSize 0

sorry its taking us a while to respond - generally raising a jira with a junit test case is the best way to go. I know its more effort - but each issue does take us a while to verify and then fix. Patches are always very welcome too! On 15 Mar 2010, at 20:02, rodos77 wrote: Any responses to

Re: Messages lost when ServerSessionPool.getServerSession() throws a JMSException

thanks for opening these! On 15 Mar 2010, at 21:52, rodos77 wrote: JIRA AMQ-2653 created: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2653 https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2653 -- View this message in context:

Re: WARN : AMQPersistenceAdapter - The ReferenceStore is not valid - recovering

this happens when AMQ Store is not shutdown cleanly - the references have to be rebuilt from the transaction logs. Nothing to worry about - but would recommend KahadB is 5.3/5.3.1 On 11 Mar 2010, at 12:14, cmoulliard wrote: Hi, How can we interpret this WARN message : 2010-03-04

Re: WARN : AMQPersistenceAdapter - The ReferenceStore is not valid - recovering

Yes 5.3.1 should be much better - can you try a snapshot of 5.3.1 ? On 11 Mar 2010, at 15:22, Roland Thomas Lichti wrote: Hi Rob, Rob Davies schrieb: this happens when AMQ Store is not shutdown cleanly - the references have to be rebuilt from the transaction logs. Nothing to worry about

Re: Move from ActiveMq Message Store to KahaDB

already done :) On 6 Mar 2010, at 10:08, cmoulliard wrote: Hi Dejan, Thanks for the tip. In fact I will create a network of brokers with by example two static url. The old one pointing to the old. As messages need to be consumed on the new broker, the old one will send the messages stored

Re: Multiple isolated brokers

activemq.xml file or otherwise that I may need to specify and change? Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Multiple-isolated-brokers-tp27720815p27720815.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Rob Davies http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work

Re: Multiple isolated brokers

Which version? There's an issue 5.3 with memory usage and Queues with KahaDB - if that's the case - try 5.3.1 snapshot Sent from my iPhone On 26 Feb 2010, at 21:46, E White ewh...@synapticfire.net wrote: We are still having memory usage issues, but I no longer think it has anything to do

Re: Too much subscription MBeans = OOM.

, to a client part of an exchange ??? Thank you in advance. Eric-AWL -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Too-much-%22subscription-MBeans%22-%3D%3E-OOM.-tp27685385p27685385.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Rob Davies http://twitter.com/rajdavies

Re: Too much subscription MBeans = OOM.

.-tp27685385p27691468.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Rob Davies http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/

Re: Did Jencks amqpool turn into org.apache.activemq.pool?

documentation should be updated to avoid confusion? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Did-Jencks-amqpool-turn-into-org.apache.activemq.pool--tp27676866p27676866.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Rob Davies http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here

Re: Problem: Failed to page in more queue messages

-messages-tp27677296p27677296.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Rob Davies http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/

Re: Stuck messages - Dispatch issues

-messages---Dispatch-issues-tp20467949p27664135.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Rob Davies http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/

Re: Bridging not working reliable

mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Rob Davies http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/

Re: OOM with high KahaDB index time

-KahaDB-index-time-tp27217704p27555173.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Rob Davies http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ -- View

Re: Slow sending of messages

I was interested to find out if you'd discovered some kind of fresh angle. Regards, Maarten -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Slow-sending-of-messages-tp26849964p27623064.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Rob Davies http

Re: Slow sending of messages

the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Rob Davies http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Slow

Re: Slow sending of messages

in context: http://old.nabble.com/Slow-sending-of-messages-tp26849964p27623064.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Rob Davies http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I'm writing this: http

Re: Slow sending of messages

- User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Rob Davies http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Slow-sending-of-messages

Re: Bytesmessage and http transport

-and-http-transport-tp21974419p27608063.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Rob Davies http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/

Re: LoggingBrokerPlugin and DLQ

mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Rob Davies http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/

Re: LoggingBrokerPlugin and DLQ

the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Rob Davies http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/

Re: OOM with high KahaDB index time

in context: http://old.nabble.com/OOM-with-high-KahaDB-index-time-tp27217704p27555173.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Rob Davies http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I'm writing this: http

Re: OOM with high KahaDB index time

in context: http://old.nabble.com/OOM-with-high-KahaDB-index-time-tp27217704p27555173.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Rob Davies http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I'm writing this: http

Re: ActiveMQ with HTTPS: message string too long

- [0x9]at org.mor -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-with-HTTPS%3A-message-string-too-long-tp27540958p27540958.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Rob Davies http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My

Re: activemq 5.3 slower than 4.1.2?

this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/activemq-5.3-slower-than-4.1.2--tp27486527p27509403.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Rob Davies http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I'm writing

Re: activemq 5.3 slower than 4.1.2?

-5.3-slower-than-4.1.2--tp27486527p27486527.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Rob Davies http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/

Re: Session.setMessageListener not working in 5.3.2

/PublicTestMessageExchange.java PublicTestMessageExchange.java Regards, Colin. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Session.setMessageListener-not-working-in-5.3.2-tp27451302p27451613.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Rob Davies http://twitter.com

Re: OOM with high KahaDB index time

lists the build date as 1/20) Once it's out, I'll give it a run through. -Original Message- From: Rob Davies [mailto:rajdav...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 9:42 AM To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: OOM with high KahaDB index time Thanks Daniel! Though please wait

Re: How can I disable Wildcards?

this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/How-can-I-disable-Wildcards--tp27315300p27380720.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Rob Davies http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I'm writing

Re: OOM with high KahaDB index time

/ still lists the build date as 1/20) Once it's out, I'll give it a run through. -Original Message- From: Rob Davies [mailto:rajdav...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 9:42 AM To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: OOM with high KahaDB index time Thanks Daniel! Though

Re: OOM with high KahaDB index time

transportConnector name=openwire uri=tcp://0.0.0.0:61616/ /transportConnectors /broker import resource=jetty.xml/ /beans -Original Message- From: Rob Davies [mailto:rajdav...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, January 18, 2010 10:42 PM To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: OOM

Re: OOM with high KahaDB index time

/ /transportConnectors /broker import resource=jetty.xml/ /beans -Original Message- From: Rob Davies [mailto:rajdav...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, January 18, 2010 10:42 PM To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: OOM with high KahaDB index time On 18 Jan 2010, at 22:14, Daniel Kluesing wrote

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >