Re: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ

2023-03-15 Thread Justin Bertram
> > -Original Message- > From: Justin Bertram > Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2023 8:55 AM > To: users@activemq.apache.org > Subject: Re: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on > OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ > > Looking back through the e

Re: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ

2023-03-15 Thread Robbie Gemmell
5.16.5 > > -Original Message- > From: Justin Bertram > Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2023 8:55 AM > To: users@activemq.apache.org > Subject: Re: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on > OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ > > Looking back through the

RE: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ

2023-03-15 Thread ABURTO, BRUNO M CTR USAF ACC 99 RS/MPC
5.16.5 -Original Message- From: Justin Bertram Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2023 8:55 AM To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ Looking back through the email thread I don't see a

Re: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ

2023-03-15 Thread Justin Bertram
> From: Justin Bertram > Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2023 8:06 AM > To: users@activemq.apache.org > Subject: Re: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on > OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ > > Are you asking about the logs themselves or the Log4j configurati

RE: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ

2023-03-15 Thread ABURTO, BRUNO M CTR USAF ACC 99 RS/MPC
Configuration file -Original Message- From: Justin Bertram Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2023 8:06 AM To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ Are you asking about the logs themselves or the

Re: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ

2023-03-15 Thread Justin Bertram
stin Bertram > Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2023 11:24 AM > To: users@activemq.apache.org > Subject: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on > OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ > > No. As the website [1] states: > > Java compatibility: 11+ > > The latest

RE: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ

2023-03-15 Thread ABURTO, BRUNO M CTR USAF ACC 99 RS/MPC
Do old Log4j files need to be deleted after updating to 5.16.6 or 5.17.4? -Original Message- From: Justin Bertram Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2023 11:24 AM To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ

Re: Re: Query on OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ

2023-03-14 Thread Justin Bertram
No. As the website [1] states: Java compatibility: 11+ The latest release that is compatible with Java 8 is 5.16.6. Justin [1] https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/download/ On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 1:21 PM ABURTO, BRUNO M CTR USAF ACC 99 RS/MPC wrote: > Can I continue to use Jav

RE: Re: Query on OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ

2023-03-14 Thread ABURTO, BRUNO M CTR USAF ACC 99 RS/MPC
Can I continue to use Java 8 with version 5.17.4? On 2023/02/22 16:08:58 Matt Pavlovich wrote: > Hello Jana- > > As far as I know, there have been no reported issues specific to the recent > generation of JDK releases by vendor. The most important thing is to use > latest releases to incorporat