ober 14, 2022 at 9:41 AM
> To: users@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Mirror compatibility across versions
> It's being done as part of this PR:
>
> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/4246
>
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 4:40 AM Robbie Gemmell
> wrote:
> >
&g
Is there anything I can do to help get the PR moving?
Is it still in draft due to the Travis failures?
From: Clebert Suconic
Date: Friday, October 14, 2022 at 9:41 AM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: Mirror compatibility across versions
It's being done as part of this PR:
https
also see a change in the schema for bootstrap.xml (binding child of web),
> > and the browse permission added to management.xml
> >
> > Along with the new log4j.properties you mentioned
> >
> > Some of those changes might be earlier if they’re backwards compatible,
&g
web),
> and the browse permission added to management.xml
>
> Along with the new log4j.properties you mentioned
>
> Some of those changes might be earlier if they’re backwards compatible, I’ve
> carried forward this configuration for awhile, but in particular the shell
>
in the schema for bootstrap.xml (binding child of
> web), and the browse permission added to management.xml
> >
> > Along with the new log4j.properties you mentioned
> >
> > Some of those changes might be earlier if they’re backwards compatible,
> I’ve carried forward this
: Re: Mirror compatibility across versions
you have to replace the script...
We will have by next week, a tool where you would
/path/to/newVersion/bin/artemis upgrade /path/to/old/instance
We would replace the artemis script, and the logging configuration.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 1:52 PM
g a new instance and merging config over.
> >
> > I have pasted a trace in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4045
> >
> > What is the impact of this issue? I’m trying to decide whether to advise
> > our IT team to continue with the planned upgrade or hol
.properties you mentioned
Some of those changes might be earlier if they’re backwards compatible, I’ve
carried forward this configuration for awhile, but in particular the shell
script changes appear to be manditory.
From: Clebert Suconic
Date: Thursday, October 13, 2022 at 12:49 PM
To: users@act
production. From a surface reading,
> possibly a resource leak?
>
>
>
>
> From: Clebert Suconic
> Date: Wednesday, October 12, 2022 at 9:54 PM
> To: users@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Mirror compatibility across versions
> Notice that main is now using SLF4j
: Re: Mirror compatibility across versions
Notice that main is now using SLF4j / log4j... (in case you manually
upgrade to a snapshot)
We are still working the details for an upgrade.
if you need to patch your 2.25.0 it's a straight change to make there
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 9:52 PM Clebert
: Clebert Suconic
> > Date: Wednesday, October 12, 2022 at 9:10 PM
> > To: users@activemq.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Mirror compatibility across versions
> > is this the actual trace? or you cut some to po
To: users@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Mirror compatibility across versions
> is this the actual trace? or you cut some to post here?
>
>
> Just puzzled by skipDelivery calling performAck..
>
> artemis-test-artemis-1-m-1 |at
> org.apache.activemq.artemis.protocol
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: Mirror compatibility across versions
is this the actual trace? or you cut some to post here?
Just puzzled by skipDelivery calling performAck..
artemis-test-artemis-1-m-1
ker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:628)
> [java.base:]
> artemis-test-artemis-1-m-1 |at
> org.apache.activemq.artemis.utils.ActiveMQThreadFactory$1.run(ActiveMQThreadFactory.java:118)
> [artemis-commons-2.25.0.jar:]
>
>
> From: Stephen Baker
> Date: Wednesday, October 12,
Subject: Re: Mirror compatibility across versions
I set up some docker images in this configuration as a preliminary step. One
oddity:
Configure 2.25 side not to run the reaper
Send message to 2.25 side
Observe that after expiry the message shows up in the expiry queue on the 2.20
side
Date: Tuesday, October 11, 2022 at 3:24 PM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: Mirror compatibility across versions
Yeah.. something like that... not necessarily in there though. but a
similar test.
On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 1:44 PM Stephen Baker
wrote:
>
> Ok, I agree based on a c
plicaTest.
>
> Stephen E. Baker
>
>
> From: Clebert Suconic
> Date: Tuesday, October 11, 2022 at 12:59 PM
> To: users@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Mirror compatibility across versions
> In theory it should work.
>
>
> Only change that might break compatib
it out with different version docker containers. I suppose as far as
writing tests you mean something like the MultiVersionReplicaTest.
Stephen E. Baker
From: Clebert Suconic
Date: Tuesday, October 11, 2022 at 12:59 PM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: Mirror compatibility across versions
In theory it should work.
Only change that might break compatibility is
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/commit/68f6d8263d8c795722805f0e4d6939e7a8b9ed48
which is ARTEMIS-3743 / ARTEMIS-3766 Use ACKReason on Mirror to
determine target operations and fixing Delivering statistics on
19 matches
Mail list logo
