Suggest
Thanks
Anurag
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Load-balancing-with-activemq-tp3494085p3494085.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
.nabble.com/load-balancing-in-activemq-tp2546606p2546606.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
of two either STICKY LOADBALANCING or
AUTODISCOVERY
IN WHICH CASE ACTIVEMQ PERFORMANCE IS HIGH??
please reply me.thanx
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/load-balancing-in-activemq-tp2546606p2546606.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list
thanks for ur help
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/load-balancing-in-activemq-tp2546606p2548009.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
2009/6/22 lzr jsw...@163.com:
Try this way:
Three brokers: b1, b2 and b3; with Queue named q1;
Config networkConnectors from b1 to b2 and b3;
For the Queue q1, run consumer application on b2 and b3; The messages put
into q1 will be dispatched to b2 and b3 in same weight.
I tried this
, the message will be routed to other queue...Now I want to know
about load balancing.
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Load-Balancing-in-ActiveMQ-tp24145146p24178063.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
fails, the message will be routed to other queue...Now I want to know about
load balancing.
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Load-Balancing-in-ActiveMQ-tp24145146p24145146.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
in advance.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Regarding-Load-Balancing-in-ActiveMQ-tp17706711s2354p17706711.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.