; View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/why-AvtiveMq-is-slowly-than-Kafka-tp4726911p4727164.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Clebert Suconic
orage to make the life easier for the user that wan't
a bound HEAP size and the most of GCs that are not very skilled (until new
ones will arrive) to deal with huge quantity of on heap references live for
long time.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/why-Av
://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/why-AvtiveMq-is-slowly-than-Kafka-tp4726911p4727164.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
30s to send 100k
> messages.
> This means , performance will occur a sharp decline when there are lots of
> msgs in journal file. Any suggestion for this scene? I overwrite the
> journal-type from NIO to ASYNCIO(or MAPPED),but no effect.
>
>
>
> --
> View this mess
Hi!
Just to understand...you've run a producer with no consumers?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/why-AvtiveMq-is-slowly-than-Kafka-tp4726911p4727139.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
k
messages.
This means , performance will occur a sharp decline when there are lots of
msgs in journal file. Any suggestion for this scene? I overwrite the
journal-type from NIO to ASYNCIO(or MAPPED),but no effect.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/why-A
://www.spec.org/jms2007/docs/DesignDocument.html#S1
>
> ----- Original Message -
> From: "Christopher Shannon"
> To: users@activemq.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, June 5, 2017 8:28:50 AM
> Subject: Re: why AvtiveMq is slowly than Kafka?
>
> That may be what the ben
t; 5) Certainly fully synchronous and persistent use-cases will reduce
>>> performance, but many use-cases don't require that.
>>> 6) Clebert's "benchmark" (both code and operating environment) is quite
>>> different from the SpecJMS results I linked.
>>
q.apache.org/artemis/docs/2.1.0/persistence.html
> > > By default Apache ActiveMQ Artemis will try and use an AIO journal.But
> it
> > > seems like that Mmap is also a good implemention.which one gives more
> > > performance?
> > >
> > >
> >
t; On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Justin Bertram wrote:
>>
>>>> Any standalone broker like ActiveMQ, Artemis, etc is going to be
>>> measured at a rate of thousands per second.
>>>
>>> For what it's worth, HornetQ (upon which Artemis is based)
From: "Michael André Pearce"
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Sent: Monday, June 5, 2017 11:19:40 AM
Subject: Re: why AvtiveMq is slowly than Kafka?
@Justin
As you noted, with all the changes since hornetq became artemis, is there an
updated run of that same JMSspec but on 2.x artemis?
and operating environment) is quite
> different from the SpecJMS results I linked.
>
>
> Justin
>
> [1] https://www.spec.org/jms2007/docs/DesignDocument.html#S1
>
> ----- Original Message -
> From: "Christopher Shannon"
> To: users@activemq.apache.
cJMS results I linked.
Justin
[1] https://www.spec.org/jms2007/docs/DesignDocument.html#S1
- Original Message -
From: "Christopher Shannon"
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Sent: Monday, June 5, 2017 8:28:50 AM
Subject: Re: why AvtiveMq is slowly than Kafka?
That may be what the benchmark sa
logspot.com/2011/07/82-million-messages-
> second-with-specjms.html
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Christopher Shannon"
> To: users@activemq.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, June 5, 2017 6:45:26 AM
> Subject: Re: why AvtiveMq is slowly than Kafka?
>
> You ca
an AIO journal.But it
> > seems like that Mmap is also a good implemention.which one gives more
> > performance?
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/why-AvtiveMq-is-slowly-than-Kafka-
> tp4726911p4726992.html
> > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> --
> Clebert Suconic
>
ce.html
>> > By default Apache ActiveMQ Artemis will try and use an AIO journal.But it
>> > seems like that Mmap is also a good implemention.which one gives more
>> > performance?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > View t
Mmap is also a good implemention.which one gives more
> > performance?
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/why-AvtiveMq-is-slowly-than-Kafka-
> tp4726911p4726992.html
> > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> --
> Clebert Suconic
>
age in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/why-AvtiveMq-is-slowly-than-Kafka-tp4726911p4726992.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Clebert Suconic
://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/why-AvtiveMq-is-slowly-than-Kafka-tp4726911p4726992.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
rsistence to be
> effectively free :)
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.
> nabble.com/why-AvtiveMq-is-slowly-than-Kafka-tp4726911p4726951.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
effectively free :)
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/why-AvtiveMq-is-slowly-than-Kafka-tp4726911p4726951.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
hing to disk. In effect this just means that it
>> is transferred into the kernel's pagecache. Does activemq have this style of
>> pagecache-centric design?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://activemq.2283324.n4
t this just means that it
> is transferred into the kernel's pagecache. Does activemq have this style of
> pagecache-centric design?
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/why-AvtiveMq-is-slowly-than-Kafka-tp472691
gt; View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/why-AvtiveMq-is-slowly-than-Kafka-tp4726911.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
this style of
pagecache-centric design?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/why-AvtiveMq-is-slowly-than-Kafka-tp4726911.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
25 matches
Mail list logo