Re: why AvtiveMq is slowly than Kafka?

2017-06-07 Thread Clebert Suconic
; View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/why-AvtiveMq-is-slowly-than-Kafka-tp4726911p4727164.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Clebert Suconic

Re: why AvtiveMq is slowly than Kafka?

2017-06-07 Thread nigro_franz
orage to make the life easier for the user that wan't a bound HEAP size and the most of GCs that are not very skilled (until new ones will arrive) to deal with huge quantity of on heap references live for long time. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/why-Av

Re: why AvtiveMq is slowly than Kafka?

2017-06-07 Thread wangqinghuan
://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/why-AvtiveMq-is-slowly-than-Kafka-tp4726911p4727164.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: why AvtiveMq is slowly than Kafka?

2017-06-07 Thread Clebert Suconic
30s to send 100k > messages. > This means , performance will occur a sharp decline when there are lots of > msgs in journal file. Any suggestion for this scene? I overwrite the > journal-type from NIO to ASYNCIO(or MAPPED),but no effect. > > > > -- > View this mess

Re: why AvtiveMq is slowly than Kafka?

2017-06-07 Thread nigro_franz
Hi! Just to understand...you've run a producer with no consumers? -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/why-AvtiveMq-is-slowly-than-Kafka-tp4726911p4727139.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: why AvtiveMq is slowly than Kafka?

2017-06-07 Thread wangqinghuan
k messages. This means , performance will occur a sharp decline when there are lots of msgs in journal file. Any suggestion for this scene? I overwrite the journal-type from NIO to ASYNCIO(or MAPPED),but no effect. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/why-A

Re: why AvtiveMq is slowly than Kafka?

2017-06-05 Thread Christopher Shannon
://www.spec.org/jms2007/docs/DesignDocument.html#S1 > > ----- Original Message - > From: "Christopher Shannon" > To: users@activemq.apache.org > Sent: Monday, June 5, 2017 8:28:50 AM > Subject: Re: why AvtiveMq is slowly than Kafka? > > That may be what the ben

Re: why AvtiveMq is slowly than Kafka?

2017-06-05 Thread Michael André Pearce
t; 5) Certainly fully synchronous and persistent use-cases will reduce >>> performance, but many use-cases don't require that. >>> 6) Clebert's "benchmark" (both code and operating environment) is quite >>> different from the SpecJMS results I linked. >>

Re: why AvtiveMq is slowly than Kafka?

2017-06-05 Thread andytaylor
q.apache.org/artemis/docs/2.1.0/persistence.html > > > By default Apache ActiveMQ Artemis will try and use an AIO journal.But > it > > > seems like that Mmap is also a good implemention.which one gives more > > > performance? > > > > > > > >

Re: why AvtiveMq is slowly than Kafka?

2017-06-05 Thread Clebert Suconic
t; On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Justin Bertram wrote: >> >>>> Any standalone broker like ActiveMQ, Artemis, etc is going to be >>> measured at a rate of thousands per second. >>> >>> For what it's worth, HornetQ (upon which Artemis is based)

Re: why AvtiveMq is slowly than Kafka?

2017-06-05 Thread Justin Bertram
From: "Michael André Pearce" To: users@activemq.apache.org Sent: Monday, June 5, 2017 11:19:40 AM Subject: Re: why AvtiveMq is slowly than Kafka? @Justin As you noted, with all the changes since hornetq became artemis, is there an updated run of that same JMSspec but on 2.x artemis?

Re: why AvtiveMq is slowly than Kafka?

2017-06-05 Thread Michael André Pearce
and operating environment) is quite > different from the SpecJMS results I linked. > > > Justin > > [1] https://www.spec.org/jms2007/docs/DesignDocument.html#S1 > > ----- Original Message - > From: "Christopher Shannon" > To: users@activemq.apache.

Re: why AvtiveMq is slowly than Kafka?

2017-06-05 Thread Justin Bertram
cJMS results I linked. Justin [1] https://www.spec.org/jms2007/docs/DesignDocument.html#S1 - Original Message - From: "Christopher Shannon" To: users@activemq.apache.org Sent: Monday, June 5, 2017 8:28:50 AM Subject: Re: why AvtiveMq is slowly than Kafka? That may be what the benchmark sa

Re: why AvtiveMq is slowly than Kafka?

2017-06-05 Thread Christopher Shannon
logspot.com/2011/07/82-million-messages- > second-with-specjms.html > > - Original Message - > From: "Christopher Shannon" > To: users@activemq.apache.org > Sent: Monday, June 5, 2017 6:45:26 AM > Subject: Re: why AvtiveMq is slowly than Kafka? > > You ca

Re: why AvtiveMq is slowly than Kafka?

2017-06-05 Thread Justin Bertram
an AIO journal.But it > > seems like that Mmap is also a good implemention.which one gives more > > performance? > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/why-AvtiveMq-is-slowly-than-Kafka- > tp4726911p4726992.html > > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > -- > Clebert Suconic >

Re: why AvtiveMq is slowly than Kafka?

2017-06-05 Thread Claus Ibsen
ce.html >> > By default Apache ActiveMQ Artemis will try and use an AIO journal.But it >> > seems like that Mmap is also a good implemention.which one gives more >> > performance? >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > View t

Re: why AvtiveMq is slowly than Kafka?

2017-06-05 Thread Christopher Shannon
Mmap is also a good implemention.which one gives more > > performance? > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/why-AvtiveMq-is-slowly-than-Kafka- > tp4726911p4726992.html > > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > -- > Clebert Suconic >

Re: why AvtiveMq is slowly than Kafka?

2017-06-03 Thread Clebert Suconic
age in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/why-AvtiveMq-is-slowly-than-Kafka-tp4726911p4726992.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Clebert Suconic

Re: why AvtiveMq is slowly than Kafka?

2017-06-03 Thread wangqinghuan
://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/why-AvtiveMq-is-slowly-than-Kafka-tp4726911p4726992.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: why AvtiveMq is slowly than Kafka?

2017-06-02 Thread Tim Bain
rsistence to be > effectively free :) > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4. > nabble.com/why-AvtiveMq-is-slowly-than-Kafka-tp4726911p4726951.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Re: why AvtiveMq is slowly than Kafka?

2017-06-02 Thread nigro_franz
effectively free :) -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/why-AvtiveMq-is-slowly-than-Kafka-tp4726911p4726951.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: why AvtiveMq is slowly than Kafka?

2017-06-02 Thread Clebert Suconic
hing to disk. In effect this just means that it >> is transferred into the kernel's pagecache. Does activemq have this style of >> pagecache-centric design? >> >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://activemq.2283324.n4

Re: why AvtiveMq is slowly than Kafka?

2017-06-02 Thread Clebert Suconic
t this just means that it > is transferred into the kernel's pagecache. Does activemq have this style of > pagecache-centric design? > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/why-AvtiveMq-is-slowly-than-Kafka-tp472691

Re: why AvtiveMq is slowly than Kafka?

2017-06-02 Thread Michael André Pearce
gt; View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/why-AvtiveMq-is-slowly-than-Kafka-tp4726911.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

why AvtiveMq is slowly than Kafka?

2017-06-02 Thread wangqinghuan
this style of pagecache-centric design? -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/why-AvtiveMq-is-slowly-than-Kafka-tp4726911.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.