Re: ActiveMQ 5.10 compatibility with KahaDB

2014-07-06 Thread khandelwalanuj
But ideally it should be supported. It may be possible that after switching broker to 5.10, broker or clients can face some issues. In such scenerios, we revert broker back to 5.8. It should be backward compatible. Thanks, Anuj -- View this message in context:

Re: ActiveMQ 5.10 compatibility with KahaDB

2014-07-06 Thread Timothy Bish
On 07/06/2014 07:18 AM, khandelwalanuj wrote: But ideally it should be supported. It may be possible that after switching broker to 5.10, broker or clients can face some issues. In such scenerios, we revert broker back to 5.8. It should be backward compatible. Thanks, Anuj -- View this

Re: ActiveMQ 5.10 compatibility with KahaDB

2014-07-06 Thread Johan Edstrom
Patches happily accepted. Sent from my pressure cooker. On Jul 6, 2014, at 5:18, khandelwalanuj khandelwal.anu...@gmail.com wrote: But ideally it should be supported. It may be possible that after switching broker to 5.10, broker or clients can face some issues. In such scenerios, we

RE: MQTT Link Stealing

2014-07-06 Thread Rich P
After testing the scenario below with version 5.10.0, I've found that the allowLinkStealing=true appears to work properly only for the *first* reconnect; if the same MQTT client reconnects a second time (using the same client-id) the previous connection is not closed and I get the following

session producer creation

2014-07-06 Thread Jamie
Greetings A friend recommended that a new Producer and Session should be created for every message put on the queue. See below Is this correct? put message on queue try { new ProducerTaskVoid() { @Override