The address [::0] is a new one on me in uri="stomp+nio://[::0]:61613
” - did you mean [::] (without the trailing zero?)
I would try stomp+nio://0.0.0.0:61613 - which is
IPv4 - but usually the platform (Windows/Linux) can handle dual
Tim,
The documentation on this topic (haha!) was never 100% clear to me. Here's
what we want to achieve given our architecture:
Topology
12 broker network (full-mesh)
All destinations dynamic (no static definitions)
Clients connect and reconnect with random brokers (preference to local)
Thanks for your response.
I looked into the extra-tests you talked about. I created a simple
application acting as the hornetq client, using the code in the test. Here
is my java code.
package hornetqTest;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.Map;
import
I am using ubuntu
$ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=14.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=trusty
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS"
Thanks,
Maneesh
--
View this message in context:
with the below simple configuration, I am not able to make activemq listen to
61613
Service is running fine,
sudo service activemq status
* Checking status of ActiveMQ instance activemqOK
but
netstat -an | grep 61613
doesnt now return anything. What am i doing wrong? Can anyone
When I execute the command,
sudo update-rc.d activemq multiuser
I get below error,
$ sudo update-rc.d activemq multiuser
update-rc.d: warning: activemq start runlevel arguments (none) do not match
LSB Default-Start values (2 3 4 5)
update-rc.d: warning: activemq stop runlevel arguments (none) do
.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/increasing-number-of-pending-message-when-consumer-hit-wrong-url-tp4717857p4717893.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
The description on the Network of Brokers wiki page says that what you're
trying to do won't work without those flags set, so you should upgrade if
this is a feature you need to use.
Tim
On Oct 13, 2016 6:33 PM, "Devlin" wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> We managed to get working
Good to hear,
Re: Your comments
The "jms.topic." and "jms.queue." prefix requirements are causing a lot of
confusion for many users, hopefully it'll be resolved soon, as part of:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-780
Regarding the divert name, we should probably throw an exception
Hi,
Artemis does support HornetQ 2.4.7.final clients and should work out of the
box.
Could you provide a reproducer? We actually have some tests under
/tests/extra-tests/protocols/hornetq that test the HornetQ client against
the latest broker. If you could contribute a test here that'd be
Thanks Tim for making things clear. I tried out with the two brokers with
each pointing to other broker in *JMS_X_SITE_CSV_URL* and both the brokers
came up without any warning. This rules out the issue for any SSL.
For the self configuration, I figured that if the value in
*JMS_X_SITE_CSV_URL*
11 matches
Mail list logo