Artemis LDAP SSL

Hi, Do you know when ldap connection with ssl will be supported? Thanks in advance, Raul

Configure activemq-client to trust any SSL certificate from the broker without verifying it

Hi, I need to configure activemq-client not to perform broker cerificate validation. I need this for testing purposes, because I need to test the system over SSL, but I do not yet have certificate distribution solved. In Artemis, with artemis-jms-client, there is verifyHost=false and

Artemis Disaster Recovery options

I am looking at options for handling local failover and disaster recovery. Our existing primary and secondary data centre hosted services run mainly active-passive and have SAN storage but do not support SAN replication. There is a dedicated network between the two DC's so we have fast, reliable

Re: Artemis LDAP SSL

The actual LDAP connection is provided by com.sun.jndi.ldap.LdapCtxFactory which I believe already supports SSL. I think you just need to set "connectionProtocol" config parameter to "ssl". Justin On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 3:18 AM, Raul Valdoleiros < raul.valdoleiros.olive...@gmail.com> wrote:

Re: Artemis Disaster Recovery options

There's nothing built in to Artemis at this point specifically for the DR use case. However, I believe the "data" directory (where persistent data is stored by default) can be replicated (e.g. via a block-level storage replication solution) or "shipped" via an external process (e.g. rsync) to a

JMS Bridge using JAAS Cert login

Hi, I'm trying to connect 2 instances of Avtivemq 5.14.0 together using a JMS bridge. I am also using the JaasCertificateAuthenticationPlugin. One broker has no JMS bridge configuration but is using the JaasCertificateAuthenticationPlugin and is using an SSLContext. The second broker is using a

Re: Artemis Disaster Recovery options

Thanks Justin. Do you know what sort of considerations I would need to make if doing shipping, e.g. 1) What config, if any, would the node in the secondary DC need to have in common with the nodes in the primary DC? e.g. see the warning box regarding copying data directories and unique node id

Re: Artemis Disaster Recovery options

> What config, if any, would the node in the secondary DC need to have in common with the nodes in the primary DC? It would need to have the same essential configuration (e.g. same addresses, queues, etc.), but it wouldn't necessarily need to be clustered or have its own HA config, etc. > I

Re: Configure activemq-client to trust any SSL certificate from the broker without verifying it

In 5.x it isn't quite as simple. To trust all you'll need to extend ActiveMQSslConnectionFactory and override the createTrustManager() method. This should work: @Override protected TrustManager[] createTrustManager() throws Exception { return new TrustManager[] { new X509TrustManager() { public

Re: [DISCUSS] Confusion surrounding the ActiveMQ project roadmap

After reading the discussion and thinking about it I think I am on board with going with ActiveMQ 6. What's the next step with this? Do we want to propose a vote or keep the discussion open longer? On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Gary Tully wrote: > I think ActiveMQ

Re: [DISCUSS] Confusion surrounding the ActiveMQ project roadmap

This discussion has been open for 15 days. IMO we should move ahead with whatever is the next step. Vote probably? On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 2:10 PM Christopher Shannon < christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote: > After reading the discussion and thinking about it I think I am on board > with