Re: Simulating loss of broker publisher connectivity

Publishers can't enqueue messages locally without a broker. No broker, no work done. However, it's possible to embed a broker within the producer process, which would then connect to the external broker when available and buffer messages when the connection is broken. But this adds complexity

[Artemis] Issue with static connectors

Hi, We have a setup Artemis broker sits behind SSL offloading hardware. client ---TLS---> VIP(ssl-offload) ---TCP--> Artemis broker We have a HA setup with one master and one broker. I have followed the examples and add two TransportConfigurations one for each. ActiveMQConnectionFactory

Re: Simulating loss of broker publisher connectivity

On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 9:44 AM, siddutta wrote: > I wish to run an experiment in which the publisher loses connection with > the > broker and then enqueues them in its own queue and then when it regains > connectivity it send s all its queued messages to the broker.

How can i get Broker Service instance of the remote broker ?

I have a use case where i have to get the broker service instance for the remote broker or getting the remote broker instance. I have tried in creating broker service instance and adding the remote connector uri address but thats not helping me to get the region broker and i am in need of region

Artemis - Duplicate message detected - message will not be routed.

Hi, I am trying to run transaction failover test which is present below on my local server cluster https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/blob/master/examples/features/ha/transaction-failover/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/jms/example/TransactionFailoverExample.java As I read

[Artemis] Set allowed SASL mechanisms

Hi, I am trying to restrict SASL mechanisms. I could not find how to do it in documentation. Is it possible to restrict SASL mechanisms for instance to EXTERNAL only? Vavricka -- View this message in context: