Hi, we've recently upgraded from amq 5.9.0 to 5.14.5, and now I get the
following, instead of the xml queue info I previously got when using the XML
Queue View from the web console:
XML Parsing Error: prefix not bound to a namespace
Location: http://amq-admin.domain/admin/xml/queues.jsp
Line
Hi Jochen,
Excellent news, glad you have found and resolved your issue.
Cheers,
Mike
Sent from my iPhone
> On 7 Jul 2017, at 16:00, jochenw wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> sorry, but the issue was a different one. It was my misunderstanding of the
> idleTimeout property.
www 122
Original message From: Clebert Suconic
Date: 7/7/17 7:56 PM (GMT+01:00) To:
users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: Increasing Duplicate ID Cache size
WwwI believe you are talking about ActiveMQ Artemis.
the duplicate detection is
Original message From: Clebert Suconic
Date: 7/7/17 7:56 PM (GMT+01:00) To:
users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: Increasing Duplicate ID Cache size
I believe you are talking about ActiveMQ Artemis.
the duplicate detection is intended for in
Currently when AcitveMQ logs in to LDAP, it is creating SecurityContext with
UserPrincipal object.
Is there a way we can also get the GroupPrincipal corresponding to user from
LDAP?
--
View this message in context:
I believe you are talking about ActiveMQ Artemis.
the duplicate detection is intended for in transit messages.. that
means.. in case you retry a send (say because of an error), the
duplicate would be ignored.. and you would then achieve Exactly Once
semantic without using transactions.
You could
Hi,
sorry, but the issue was a different one. It was my misunderstanding of the
idleTimeout property. Is doesn't timeout a connection which is used from the
pool, but the connection which the pool opens to the broker. My settings
were such that the timeout was too short for the connection pool to
Hi Mike,
good idea. I still have to do some testing, but on a first glance, I saw
that in the JUnit test, they never close a created connection.
I thought that after getting a connection from the PooledConnectionFactory
with connection = pooledConnectionFactory.createConnection() and having
Hi Tim,
thanks for clarifying this. I may have expressed it not precisely in my
answer: the problem exactly was that for the broker1_broker2_simplex bridge,
when sending messages to a queue which is initially only known by broker 2
(because only there a consumer exists for this queue), sometimes
Hi everyone,
The ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce that Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.0
has been released and includes many fixes and improvements.
Also note that this release bumps the minimum required Java version to Java
8.
A list of issues resolved in this release is available here:
Thanks for explaining what you did.
Tim
On Jul 7, 2017 2:23 AM, "sgtech" wrote:
> At first we only use the default jdbcPersistenceAdapter (without the lease
> lock) -> not surviving a network disconnection
>
> Then we tried to change the wrapper.conf to
Hi,
Due to the requirement of being able to store a large number of messages
in the queue without duplicates, I am considering increasing the
duplicate id cache size (parameter: id-cache-size) from its default
value of 2000 to a million. While I know that this would require
additional
Dear Tim
Thanks for helping me a lot.
Let me answer your questions.
> Were your IoT processes publishing to queues or topics?
Topics
> To a single one or to one per client?
To a single ActiveMQ broker.
> Was anything consuming the messages?
Yes, our subscriber consume the topics.
> Were
At first we only use the default jdbcPersistenceAdapter (without the lease
lock) -> not surviving a network disconnection
Then we tried to change the wrapper.conf to restart the AMQ service -> not
working also
wrapper.filter.trigger.1=Failed to start Apache ActiveMQ
14 matches
Mail list logo