5.x doesn't even require the locking behavior if you have an alternate
locking mechanism via the pluggable locker capability:
http://activemq.apache.org/pluggable-storage-lockers.html
Tim
On Fri, May 18, 2018, 3:05 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> Only thing both Artemis
Only thing both Artemis and activemq 5 will need is distributed locking
working of a file to guarantee only one sever is running. Nothing fancy
about It.
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 3:07 PM Kyle Le wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to ask if activemq supports NFSv4.1 for it's
Hi,
I would like to ask if activemq supports NFSv4.1 for it's message store.
I've search Activemq documentation but didn't happen to find any information
on supported versions of NFS. Thanks.
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
Hi there,
After days trying & furious googling here is one last roll of the
demonstrable clustering dice.
Running
apache-artemis-2.5.0/examples/features/clustered/clustered-static-discovery
with mvn verify works just fine, which is great.
When trying to duplicate this on AWS EC2 (in a VPC of
Hi there,
My humble apologies. That setup does in fact work on EC2.
I just had to adapt it and have posted it all here:
https://github.com/nicodewet/activemq-artemis-clustered-static-discovery
I'll clean it up & document what I did in the coming days so it could help
others.
Cheers,
Nico
--