I've made some headway on this, but could still use some help.
I went through and deleted all of the Offline Durable Topic Subscribers.
That freed up a little space (1%) in the store.
I notice there's a parameter /JournalFilesForFullRecovery that shows//a
value of 6500+. When I deleted the
Hello Paul-
Yes, please file a JIRA. However, if you are a behind a load balancer, it is
valid to host a single hostname in the URI
failover:(https://company.com/broker) and have the load balancer abstract the
number of brokers.
In your setup, is there a reason to require the need the path to
For posterity's sake...
Yes. That is the relevant PR.
Justin
On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 1:33 AM andrea bisogno wrote:
> Hi Justin,
> thanks for your quick reply.
> Is the PR this one: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/4396 ?
> Many thanks,
>
> Andrea
>
See ARTEMIS-3887 [1] regarding this behavior.
Justin
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3887
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 11:57 AM Aaron Hoffer wrote:
> I'm looking at line
>
>
As Robbie noted, the REST interface was removed in 2.26.0. You can find the
original discussion regarding removal here [1].
As I understand it, here are the essential reasons for removing it:
- The dependencies had fallen woefully out-of-date and nobody was willing
to put in the effort to fix
I'm looking at line
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/blob/1a49845628d66f1bd3fbc6b5ecbfd24a8fb5aac6/artemis-commons/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/utils/collections/TypedProperties.java#L248-L248
A bug in our code caused that line to be hit. As far as I can tell, hitting
that
Hi,
I've found what I think is a bug in the failover transport in 5.x. If I use two
https URLs that share a hostname & Port (https://company,com/broker/1 &
https://company,com/broker/2) then the second doesn't get added to the failover
transport's internal list of URIs to try.
This is due to
It was removed in 2.26.0 about 6 months ago, see details at
https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/documentation/latest/versions.html
On Thu, 9 Mar 2023 at 22:52, Thai Le wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Does the REST API still exist in the latest version? I do not see it in the
> doc of 2.28.
>
>
