How does the this version relate to the Apache ActiveMQ Artemis versioning? Is
there a mapping, or is it completely separate from Artemis? We are evaluating
Artemis; so are wondering.
Thanks,
Anindya Haldar
Oracle Marketing Cloud
> On May 22, 2018, at 11:34 AM, Christopher Shan
Thanks for clarifying.
Anindya Haldar
Oracle Marketing Cloud
> On May 22, 2018, at 12:30 PM, Timothy Bish <tabish...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 05/22/2018 03:27 PM, Anindya Haldar wrote:
>> How does the this version relate to the Apache ActiveMQ Artemis versioning?
, high availability, and high performance and
scale, amongst other things. We are looking towards a full blown technology
evaluation with those needs in mind.
Thanks,
Anindya Haldar
Oracle Marketing Cloud
> On Jun 13, 2018, at 7:23 PM, Justin Bertram wrote:
>
>> Q1: A
,
Anindya Haldar
Oracle Marketing Cloud
> On Jun 13, 2018, at 7:31 PM, Justin Bertram wrote:
>
> Did you have a chance to test this scenario on a bare metal system? If so,
> what were the results? If not, did you find the root cause of the missing
> messages in something re
Thanks, again, for your quick response.
Anindya Haldar
Oracle Marketing Cloud
> On Jun 14, 2018, at 3:34 PM, Justin Bertram wrote:
>
>> 1) It is possible to define multiple groups within a cluster, and a
> subset of the brokers in the cluster can be members of a
When we started, we started with 2.4.0, and are so far trying to understand how
we can use it effectively for our purpose. That said, the later versions of
Artemis are definitely in our radar.
Thanks,
Anindya Haldar
Oracle Marketing Cloud
> On Jun 14, 2018, at 4:48 PM, Clebert Suco
BTW, these are questions related to Artemis 2.4.0, which is what we are
evaluating right now for our solution.
> On Jun 13, 2018, at 5:52 PM, Anindya Haldar wrote:
>
> I have some questions related to the HA cluster, failover and split-brain
> cases.
>
> Suppose I ha
ease clarify?
Would appreciate if someone can offer clarity on these questions.
Thanks,
Anindya Haldar
Oracle Marketing Cloud
Haldar
Oracle Marketing Cloud
> On Jun 14, 2018, at 9:57 AM, Anindya Haldar wrote:
>
> Many thanks, Justin. This makes things much clearer for us when it comes to
> designing the HA cluster.
>
> As for the Artemis evaluation scope, we want to use it as one of the
>
the slave allows failback. But apparently no failback happened.
I do not have the logs to analyze; so I am attaching the broker xml
configurations of the 6 brokers I got from people who ran the actual
experiments.
Any insights regarding the issues will be highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Anindya
power
off the host system, but only the VirtualBox VM during the tests.
Thanks,
Anindya Haldar
Oracle Marketing Cloud
-Original Message-
From: Martyn Taylor [mailto:mtay...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2018 2:42 AM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: Artemis 2.4.0
VirtualBox VM from the picture.
Thanks,
Anindya Haldar
Oracle Marking Cloud
-Original Message-
From: Justin Bertram [mailto:jbert...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2018 6:58 AM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: Artemis 2.4.0 message loss in durability tests upon system
Anyone have any insights into the Artemis behavior described here?
Thanks,
Anindya Haldar
Oracle Marketing Cloud
> On Jun 26, 2018, at 4:50 PM, Anindya Haldar wrote:
>
> The setup:
>
> - We are setting up a cluster of 6 brokers using Artemis 2.4.0.
> - The cluster has
13 matches
Mail list logo
