AMQ_SCHEDULED_DELAY not respected after upgrade to activemq 5.10

and the AMQ_SCHEDULED_DELAY property is being logged. so i know it is correctly sent to activemq I've attached my activemq.xml (copied from 5.8) Does anyone have any idea why this is happening and or how I can remedy this ? --Jelmer

Re: Sending exception to client: ActiveMQNonExistentQueueException[errorType=QUEUE_DOES_NOT_EXIST message=AMQ119017: Queue jms.queue.queueName does not exist]

P.S Extra question, when this logging is seen, does this mean a message is not sent (E.G dataloss?) -- View this message in context:

Sending exception to client: ActiveMQNonExistentQueueException[errorType=QUEUE_DOES_NOT_EXIST message=AMQ119017: Queue jms.queue.queueName does not exist]

As team, we are migrating from active mq artemis V1.1 to version 1.5.3. To test the queue, we turned on debug logging and then we got the following DEBUG trace. What does this loggin mean, we see nothing on the side of the client/consumer in terms of exceptions or warnings. We expected the queue

Do address-settings merge?

the following queue with as name "jms.queue.queueName" also get the settings that match "#"? Would the settings for the matcher "#" overwrite the settings for matcher "jms.queue.queueName" or is this order dependent? Kind regards, Jelmer v. Amen Example configur

High load when using the exclusive consumer feature in artemis 2.6.1

multiple (exclusive consumer) queues with multiple consumers, this leads to our artemis becoming unresponsive/not functional. Does anyone know what causes this behaviour and what might fix it? Kind regards, Jelmer van Amen See https://activemq.apache.org/artemis/docs/latest/exclusive-queues.html

Apache Artemis 2.25 message counters differ from actual number of messages

. The remaining 1000 messages do not seem to be on the queues anymore. My consumers do not use message-selectors/filters. Has anyone else encountered these problems and is there anything we can do about it ? Best regards, Jelmer

Re: Apache Artemis 2.25 message counters differ from actual number of messages

differ from actual number of messages do you have your destinations paging? I have a page-counter issue I'm currently working on. On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 10:32 AM Jelmer Marinus wrote: > > Hi, > > I have a 3 node Apache Artemis 2.25 symmetrical cluster setup. Each cluster > nod

Re: Apache Artemis 2.25 message counters differ from actual number of messages

0 distribution for a total of 3000 messages. Which specific "message counters" are you inspecting? Do you have any consumers connected when you send the messages or do you only connect the consumers later after all the messages are sent? Justin On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 9:32 AM Jelmer Marinus

Re: Apache Artemis 2.25 message counters differ from actual number of messages

5, 2022 at 4:31 AM Jelmer Marinus wrote: > > The message-counter we are inspecting is retrieved by requesting the > "messageCount" of the queue using the "activemq.management" management queue. > When this was of we checked the Hawtio web-console and looked

Messages getting lost on Artemis 2.25

queues. * There was paging on the queues. * ZGC garbage collector Best regards, Jelmer

Re: Messages getting lost on Artemis 2.25

a test to reproduce the issue ? On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 3:16 AM Jelmer Marinus wrote: > Hi, > > During the testing of the message-counters (see other mail) we also seem > to have lost messages. It looks like these messages get lost during > redistribution or when they get produced

Re: jms messages keep getting stuck in our queues.

consumers where not removed, even though there was no client connected to it. Stopping HornetQ removed the consumers. We lowered the connection-ttl so consumers are removed earlier without a restart. Best regards, Jelmer From: Wendell Hatcher Sent: Friday, October 28, 20