@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: ActiveMQ 5.16.x Master/Slave topology question
On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 17:20:31 +0100, Vilius Šumskas wrote:
>[...]
> As an alternative, does anybody know if I can use non-HTTP SSL load balancer
> and set client URI to something like ssl://loadbalancer_host:61
- Simon
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2021 6:01 PM
> > To: users@activemq.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: ActiveMQ 5.16.x Master/Slave topology question
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > masterslave:
t; Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2021 6:01 PM
> To: users@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: Re: ActiveMQ 5.16.x Master/Slave topology question
>
> Hi,
>
> masterslave: transport is deprecated. You can achieve the same with
> randomize=false basically.
>
> Correct: updateClusterClientOnRe
:)).
--
Vilius
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2021 6:01 PM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: ActiveMQ 5.16.x Master/Slave topology question
Hi,
masterslave: transport is deprecated. You can achieve the same with
randomize=false
Hi,
masterslave: transport is deprecated. You can achieve the same with
randomize=false basically.
Correct: updateClusterClientOnRemove is only for network connection, but
when you have active/active (so a real network).
No, the clients won't be stuck: they will reconnect to the new
, November 30, 2021 7:01 AM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: ActiveMQ 5.16.x Master/Slave topology question
Hi
No need to use networkConnector with master/slave.
Just use failover on the client side.
So basically,
1. Brokers side, you shared the same filesystem (using NFS, LUN, whatever
Hi
No need to use networkConnector with master/slave.
Just use failover on the client side.
So basically,
1. Brokers side, you shared the same filesystem (using NFS, LUN, whatever), and
you configure kahadb to point on the same filesystem in activemq.xml
2. On client side, you can
Hi,
I‘m trying to setup a simple ActiveMQ 5.16.x master/slave cluster using shared
filesystem option. I just need one broker running at any given time and a slave
for HA.
The filesystem part is clear and I have already configured it according to
ActiveMQ requirements.
What I don’t understand
