Re: Any comments? (Re: Use the DNS cache as a backup, in case DNS lookup (temporarily)) fails.

2011-05-12 Thread Stephen R. van den Berg
Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote: First, and most important: I don't think aox is ever going to do dnssec validation or anything else which libunbound offers and jdns doesn't. Doing dnssec ourselves would mean adding things like DLV-related variables to archiveopteryx.conf, and that's so far from our core

Re: Any comments? (Re: Use the DNS cache as a backup, in case DNS lookup (temporarily)) fails.

2011-05-11 Thread Arnt Gulbrandsen
I've made up my mind: I like jdns much better than libunbound for aox. First, and most important: I don't think aox is ever going to do dnssec validation or anything else which libunbound offers and jdns doesn't. Doing dnssec ourselves would mean adding things like DLV-related variables to

Re: Any comments? (Re: Use the DNS cache as a backup, in case DNS lookup (temporarily)) fails.

2011-05-07 Thread Axel Rau
Am 07.05.2011 um 14:42 schrieb Stephen R. van den Berg: Axel Rau wrote: FreeBSD 8.0 includes unbound 1.3.3 and 8.2 includes 1.4.5. libunbound is not the same as unbound, they are related though, so it is very likely that libunbound is present, if unbound is. I see. It's in FreeBSD ports