Re: [appfuse-user] CRUD generation for models with non numeric version fields

2007-10-09 Thread Matt Raible
Can you enter an issue for this in JIRA? It sounds like the version annotation is overriding the Data type. Does the issue only happen in sample-data.xml or does it happen other places as well? Matt On 10/9/07, RoyPorter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This is an excerpt from the model: > > /*

Re: [appfuse-user] CRUD generation for models with non numeric version fields

2007-10-09 Thread RoyPorter
This is an excerpt from the model: /** * Date/time record was last changed */ private Date lastChanged; /** * Returns the property last Changed. * @return the lastChanged date */ @Version @Temporal (value = TemporalType.TIMESTAMP) public Date

Re: [appfuse-user] CRUD generation for models with non numeric version fields

2007-10-08 Thread John Coleman
What does the Hibernate mapping/annotation look like? I could see you having a problem if you tagged the attribute with a version tag. Coleman On Oct 8, 2007, at 7:09 PM, Matt Raible wrote: Is this a java.util.Date or a number? If it's a java.util.Date, it should generate the correct sampl

Re: [appfuse-user] CRUD generation for models with non numeric version fields

2007-10-08 Thread Matt Raible
Is this a java.util.Date or a number? If it's a java.util.Date, it should generate the correct sample data. If it doesn't, that's a bug. Matt On 10/8/07, RoyPorter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Our model classes have a lastChangedDate which doubles up as the version > field for the model, and a

[appfuse-user] CRUD generation for models with non numeric version fields

2007-10-08 Thread RoyPorter
Our model classes have a lastChangedDate which doubles up as the version field for the model, and a trace of when the record was last changed. When using the appfuse plugin to generate the CRUD code, sample data is created with incorrect entries in the lastChangedDate fields - i.e. '1' rather tha