Eike Stepper wrote:
the following code lines do not work:
ContainmentModel containmentModel = kernel.getModel();
ReferenceDescriptor reference = new
ReferenceDescriptor(Identifiable.class.getName());
ComponentModel componentModel = (ComponentModel)
containmentModel.getModel(reference)
"Niclas Hedhman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Tuesday 01 June 2004 17:39, Eike Stepper wrote:
> > i have no jar for now and i usually don't use maven when i work in eclipse.
> > i manually copied pieces from the merlin tutorial (as i showed in former
> > p
On Tuesday 01 June 2004 17:39, Eike Stepper wrote:
> i have no jar for now and i usually don't use maven when i work in eclipse.
> i manually copied pieces from the merlin tutorial (as i showed in former
> postigs), the eclipse builder compiles the source files to the bin folder
> (and also copies
"Niclas Hedhman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> On Sunday 30 May 2004 02:49, Eike Stepper wrote:
> > you are right. i'll try to let merlin run embedded in an eclipse plugin
at
> > client-side. in fact i already succeeded to port the "generic embedding"
> >
hi niclas,
i have no jar for now and i usually don't use maven when i work in eclipse.
i manually copied pieces from the merlin tutorial (as i showed in former postigs),
the eclipse builder compiles the source files to the bin folder (and also copies all
non-java resources). it doesn't seem to be
On Tuesday 01 June 2004 16:48, Eike Stepper wrote:
> ok, that sounds reasonable for jar archives and becomes important
> when releasing the projet. but i'm at the very beginning of playing with
> merlin. the sources are copied from the some of the tutorial chapters and
> compiled into a bin-folder
hi stephen,
just to clarify, i have the feeling that the creation of the DefaultKernel does all
the commisioning automatically:
Factory factory = builder.getFactory();
Map criteria = factory.createDefaultCriteria();
criteria.put("merlin.deployment", new String[] { "bin"});
criteri
"Stephen McConnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Eike Stepper wrote:
>
> > hi stephen,
> >
> > the "bin/BLOCK-INF/block.xml" looks like:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> The ab
Eike Stepper wrote:
hi stephen,
the "bin/BLOCK-INF/block.xml" looks like:
The above definition looks like a block.xml file that was packaged
inside a jar file (in which case the enclosing jar is implicitly
included in the classpath). In you scena
hi stephen,
the "bin/BLOCK-INF/block.xml" looks like:
in HelloComponent.xinfo there is:
http://avalon.apache.org/dtds/meta/type_1_1.dtd"; >
hello
1.0.0
singleton
hard
and the concole shows:
[DEBUG
Eike Stepper wrote:
Yo!
hi stephen,
After adding the model via something like the model.addContainmentModel(
url ) operation or as your describing above - what you have is a new
sub-model within the container - however, the sub-model isn't wired-up
yet. Once you have added all of the models you
> Yo!
hi stephen,
> After adding the model via something like the model.addContainmentModel(
> url ) operation or as your describing above - what you have is a new
> sub-model within the container - however, the sub-model isn't wired-up
> yet. Once you have added all of the models you want you n
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Sunday 30 May 2004 04:19, Eike Stepper wrote:
Do you mean getting it to run once it has been loaded?
hmm, i've come to another question: the block seems to start
running automatically. that could be ok, but how can i access
it from the plugin?
i'd like to call the start() m
On Sunday 30 May 2004 04:42, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> However, I am NOT sure how to effectively build the compModel ( a
> DeploymentModel instance, which is either a component or a container ) in
> an effective/quick way, and hope that Stephen can help you with that.
Looking at the merlin/cli/.../
On Sunday 30 May 2004 04:19, Eike Stepper wrote:
> > Do you mean getting it to run once it has been loaded?
>
> hmm, i've come to another question: the block seems to start
> running automatically. that could be ok, but how can i access
> it from the plugin?
>
> i'd like to call the start() method
> Do you mean getting it to run once it has been loaded?
hmm, i've come to another question: the block seems to start
running automatically. that could be ok, but how can i access
it from the plugin?
i'd like to call the start() method on a component for example...
/eike
---
On Sunday 30 May 2004 02:49, Eike Stepper wrote:
> you are right. i'll try to let merlin run embedded in an eclipse plugin at
> client-side. in fact i already succeeded to port the "generic embedding"
> example to a plugin. the resulting DefaultKernel is obviously running and
> can be shut down pro
> To me it sounds that you expect the clients to be fairly 'heavy', in which
> case the Merlin overhead could be considered fairly low, in terms of startup
> time and memory requirement.
you are right. i'll try to let merlin run embedded in an eclipse plugin at client-side.
in fact i already succe
On Saturday 29 May 2004 22:00, Eike Stepper wrote:
> if you really want, you're invited to have a look at my cdo project
> (connected data objects), which is open source and hosted at
> http://developer.berlios.de/projects/cdo. i've appended the original
> project reg. request to get a fast impres
[...]
> That part of Avalon is fairly straight forward to understand and implement by
> yourself outside the robust Merlin platform.
well, i think i'll manage it ;-)
> Facilities = Components that have access to the Merlin internals. To provide
> the JMX (which is a facility (still in development
On Saturday 29 May 2004 20:46, Eike Stepper wrote:
> do you basically suggest to enhance my signalling classes with full
> support for avalon lifecycle control?
It is your choice whether you want "full support" or "partial support", and
that is why you need the question; "Where are the benefits
hi niclas,
thanks for your detailed answer. because i'm very new to avalon
i had to think a while whether i understood it.
do you basically suggest to enhance my signalling classes with full
support for avalon lifecycle control? that would mean to deploy the
avalon jars to the client (because of
On Saturday 29 May 2004 16:09, Eike Stepper wrote:
> could anyone suggest how to componentize my code on the one hand
> and to deploy parts of it to a client without merlin on the other?!
I think you first need to ask yourself;
"What part of Avalon/Merlin will bring me the benefits in my system
hi there,
i'm currently investigating how to provide a better
infra structure to an existing client-server-application.
this way i came to merlin (an alternative for me could be
a plugin collection in a headless eclipse environment, but
i'd prefer the merlin approach since it seems suited better
f
24 matches
Mail list logo