I will incorporate ur suggestions, and come back again.
Thank you
Nafees
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Routes-controlling-thread-dsl-tp5719019p5719163.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks for letting me know.
The ticket doesn't have any target milestone, is there a short term plan to
work on this issue?
Othewise I suppose the only way out for me would be to roll back to last
2.8.x...
--
View this message in context:
Great. That works. Thanks.
BTW, the example in the Camel in Action book (p 322) seems wrong then as
it describes it the way I originally had it.
Tim
On 12/09/2012 03:34, Willem jiang wrote:
You need set the seda endpoint parameter on the first one endpoint, because
Camel will pickup the
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Tim Dudgeon tdudgeon...@gmail.com wrote:
Great. That works. Thanks.
BTW, the example in the Camel in Action book (p 322) seems wrong then as it
describes it the way I originally had it.
The book is not wrong. The block parameter is on the *producer* side,
so
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Tim Dudgeon tdudgeon...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, thanks. So I think I get it now. Some params need defining on the 'from'
side and some on the 'to' side. And the order the queue appears in the
routes is important. So this seems to work for me. Is this correct?
Hi I would like to perform sticky load balncing in apache camel based on the
SOAP session, whcih is embedded in ServiceGroupID node of the first
response.
I wrote a small route as follow:
from(uri)
.loadBalance().sticky(xpath(query).namespaces(env).namespaces(wsa).namespaces(ax))
.to(BE1,BE2);
As *always* with xpath, make sure it works first.
For example set it to a header, and then use the camel tracer / log
component etc. to log it.
Also with xpath the result type is usually some XML type. And thus you
need to set it to String if you want just text.
There is a resultType on the
Instead of using camel-cxf component, this is most effective way to do the load
balancing.
I think you can do some tracing work to see if the xpath expression return the
right ServiceGroupID first.
Then we can keep digging if the sticky load balancing is doing its job.
--
Willem Jiang
Hi,
I just created a small java program just to check if my xpath provides me
with the appropriate infromation that I want(i.e the ServiceGroup ID) And I
go the output as
urn:uuid:99A029EBBC70DBEB221347349722532, the term after urn:uuid: is the
session Id.
So are the terms urn:uuid: culprit?
When using the File component to write to a file is it always the
message body that is written, or is it possible to use an expression
(e.g. simple)?
Of course body can be replaced with new content using an expression, but
is that the only way to do this?
Tim
Is substring supported in camel by the way?
some thing like this
xpath.compile(substring(string(/*[local-name()='Envelope']/*[local-name()='Header']/*[local-name()='ReplyTo']/*[local-name()='ReferenceParameters']/*[local-name()='ServiceGroupId']/text()),
10));
Return me an error, saying
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Tim Dudgeon tdudgeon...@gmail.com wrote:
When using the File component to write to a file is it always the message
body that is written, or is it possible to use an expression (e.g. simple)?
Of course body can be replaced with new content using an expression,
I created a route that I was trying to use to filter messages from a
destination.
@Override
public void configure() throws Exception {
from(requestEndpoint).routeId(createRouteId())
.filter(body(String.class).contains(content))
I am caught in this problem for a while now and am not able to figure out how
to solve it.
I have a client that sends a SOAP request and gets a SOAP response from the
servers.
I have written a wrote to do a sticky load balance:
from(uri)
.loadBalance().sticky(xpath(query2))
.to(BE1,BE2);
If i
Hi
You have already posted about this in another thread. Please dont
start new topics about the same.
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 3:49 PM, balkishore balkishore.pan...@gmail.com wrote:
I am caught in this problem for a while now and am not able to figure out how
to solve it.
I have a client
If the messages gets dequed only, then the expression returns false,
so the message gets dropped.
Make sure the value content has been set before the configure method
is invoked.
For example you can do a System out println of content variable from
the configure meyhod. It may be null at the time.
Hi,
I have a simple bridging route defined as
The toBean has a WS-Policy attached that demands a UsernameToken.
As per the CXF documentation I try to set the username and password on the
toBean like this:
However, it seems those properties are simply discarded, and the CXF Policy
Thanks for the response Claus,
Here is the routes Description:
EventDrivenConsumerRoute[Endpoint[activemq://queue:esigSigRqst] -
Instrumentation:route[UnitOfWork(RouteContextProcessor[Channel[Filter[if:
bodyAs[java.lang.String] contains POS do:
And without the filter so its straight from - to. Does that work for you?
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:26 PM, chris.o...@mediadriver.com wrote:
Thanks for the response Claus,
Here is the routes Description:
EventDrivenConsumerRoute[Endpoint[activemq://queue:esigSigRqst] -
The idea is to start up a route to selectively move messages from one
queue to another based on an expression. This is, as far as I know, the
Selective Consumer EIP. The idea would be if the filter returns true,
move the message to the next destination otherwise leave it in the
I have also have another route that uses this which works correctly...
@Override
public void configure() throws Exception {
from(requestEndpoint).routeId(createRouteId())
.filter(header(headerName).isEqualTo(headerValue))
Hello,
The way you see it behave is the way it should behave. If you have
competing consumers on a queue they will consume messages in that way.
If I interpreted your requirement correctly you have messages from a#
that can only be consumed by c# and messages from b# that can only be
consumed by
thanks for the links. I'm trying to convince them why camel is better than
BPEL in the system integration world, any suggestions welcome
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 5:37 PM, chris snow chsnow...@gmail.com wrote:
you may find these links useful:
Camel's a lot cheaper than Oracle...?
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Bing Lu real...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks for the links. I'm trying to convince them why camel is better than
BPEL in the system integration world, any suggestions welcome
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 5:37 PM, chris snow
I want to know who is planning to join ApacheCon EU 2012 in Sinnsheim,
Germany (5th November - 8th November)? We will have 5 talks in the Camel
in Action track (one of them is about ActiveMQ and four talks about
Camel)...
Somebody interested in a get together evening event? If so, I would try to
Hi all.
I think I'm missing something obvious, but I can't find anything here that
is similar to my problem, or any docs that tell me it's obvious James you
twerp:
I've put together a route that multicasts to three direct routes, which
simply return setBody type responses. I have intentionally
Oh, and the asyncCallbackRequestBody call is intentional (I am under the
impression that this is a way to have an InOut route that doesn't block the
initiating thread... my multicast routes will eventually be CXF over JMS
calls).
--
View this message in context:
27 matches
Mail list logo
