Hi
What are you doing in Camel. It seems your issue is maybe that
somehow/somewhere you force a type conversion from file - String and
that is causing to load the entire file into memory. And therefor you
should find that problem and fix that instead.
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 9:04 PM, bbk
Hi
The problem is when I do on the large files:
- exchange.getIn().getBody(InputStream.class)
- exchange.getIn().getBody(String.class)
...
So, how can I resolve this problem?
--
View this message in context:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 11:27 AM, bbk brendi...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi
The problem is when I do on the large files:
- exchange.getIn().getBody(InputStream.class)
- exchange.getIn().getBody(String.class)
here is your problem as you convert the payload to a String which
reads in the entire
Hi,
You can use inOut instead of to in order to have the output of your
processor in the body of the exchange:
http://camel.apache.org/request-reply.html.
Hope it'll help.
Regards
2014-04-07 19:20 GMT+02:00 scottmiles motgu...@gmail.com:
My application needs to work as middleware where it
Hi,
I just realized that you cannot have a direct-vm in a route context.I
assume that would be the same with vm. Makes completely sense since
direct-vm can only exist once in the VM while routeContext can be imported
in many different camel contexts. The error messages though were a bit
baffling:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 2:02 PM, stefan@zv-extern.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Hello,
You can try with mapMailMessage=false, and then use Camel's error
handler if parsing the body / attachments of the mail fails.
this would only prevent this special error, but perhaps there will others
rise in
Thank you for your response.
But I have the same problem but somewhere and I don't find that is causing.
The trace is:
Error during type conversion from type:
org.apache.camel.component.file.Generi
cFile to the required type: java.lang.String with value GenericFile[...] due
Please watch
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-7357
Cheers, Sergey
On 08/04/14 18:51, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
On 08/04/14 05:59, vrahul wrote:
Cxf with camel always surprised me. ExceptionMapper is a basic
requirement
expected from the restfull server. Please let me know once you
Hi Anuj,
1. Does camel need ActiveMQ broker to run or it can work without ActiveMQ
also ?
ActiveMQ is only one among many [1] components supported by Camel. So yes,
you can run Camel without AMQ.
2. What are the possible use cases where I can use camel with ActiveMQ ?
Well, actually
We are using Camel (with CXF and Karaf). Does anyone know if we should be
concerned with this new OpenSSL security bug?
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Is-Camel-affected-by-the-OpenSSL-heart-bleed-bug-tp5750006.html
Sent from the Camel - Users
Hi,
I've fixed the NPE in WSS4J. Yes, there is an asymmetry for the SAML case
between the outbound and inbound configurations. This is mainly for
historical reasons, not to break backwards compatibility with older
deployments. On the outbound side, the Unsigned action just creates a
SAML Token
Hi,
I've fixed the NPE in WSS4J. With WSS4J 1.6.x, you need to specify a
samlPropFile value when adding a SAML Token. For example:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/webservices/wss4j/branches/1_6_x-fixes/src/test/resources/saml_sv.properties?view=markup
Camel, CXF, Karaf are all written in Java and Java has its own crypto/SSL
implementation. There's no dependency on OpenSSL in any of those
applications/frameworks.
Of course if you're running Camel/CXF/Karaf on a server that does use
OpenSSL for something else (let's say you're running Camel or
Hi,
I have a question about how to route messages between OSGi bundles within
the same container. If I have two bundles, B1 and B2, which have their own
camel routes and I want them to send messages to each other, say from B1 to
B2, what's the best practice approach on how to do this?
So for
Hi,
I have a good understanding of ActiveMQ. I am apache exploring camel to
extend the use of ActiveMQ. I was reading the basic articles and websites.
Just stuck with some questions:
1. Does camel need ActiveMQ broker to run or it can work without ActiveMQ
also ?
2. What are the possible use
Hi Williem,
I see this issue is fixed. But I still get the faultcode like this. By the
way, I am setting a header for the faultcode in my route. Please suggest.
soap:Envelope xmlns:soap=http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/;
soap:Body
soap:Fault
Hi,
Yes, you can use camel direct-vm instead of direct component and it is for
synchronous behavior. For async communication you can use camel-vm
component. Refer this documentation for more info:
camel-VM: http://camel.apache.org/vm.html
Camel-Direct-vm: https://camel.apache.org/direct-vm.html
So I still have an error:
I never go to my first choice: 'enabled':
choice
when
xpath
headerName=ROUTE_CONFIGURATION_HEADER/authorizationCheck='enabled'/xpath
log message= Authorization enabled /
process ref=authorizationProcessor /
18 matches
Mail list logo