Re: Camel with Rabbitmq: messages in temp reply queue not being acked

2018-08-22 Thread Claus Ibsen
Hi Thanks the PR has been merged, you can see from the fix-version in the JIRA which releases it will be in On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 10:58 AM, Valdis Andersons wrote: > Hi Claus, > > Pull request #2490 has been created now. > https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/2490 > > If you're happy with

RE: Camel with Rabbitmq: messages in temp reply queue not being acked

2018-08-22 Thread Valdis Andersons
Hi Claus, Pull request #2490 has been created now. https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/2490 If you're happy with the change could you please merge it up and let me know which release will have the code in it? Also, if there is anything more I need to do with the fix/Pull Request please let

AW: NoSuchMethodError RemoteFileEndpoint isPreSort

2018-08-22 Thread th.rich...@uksh.de
Moin, mea culpa :-| mvn clean helps mit freundlichen Grüßen / kind regards Thomas Richter [http://media.uksh.de/logo/uksh.gif] Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Rechtsfähige Anstalt des öffentlichen Rechts der Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel und der Universität zu Lübeck

Re: Enabling transactions for sjms-batch [Was: Transactions (Multiple JMS Consumers) and Aggregation]

2018-08-22 Thread Claus Ibsen
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 6:28 PM, Rajith Muditha Attapattu wrote: > Quick clarification.. > > Do we still need to use the transacted() directive in the DSL or is it > enough to set the transacted=true in the endpoint URI ? > That depends, if all you need is JMS transacted ack mode, and there are

Re: Camel with Rabbitmq: messages in temp reply queue not being acked

2018-08-22 Thread Claus Ibsen
Hi Validis Yeah that sounds good. Great to hear we have a solution for this issue now. On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 5:58 PM, Valdis Andersons wrote: > Hi Claus, > > That seems to work as expected, deployed a local build to test and no more > stale messages in un-acked states in the temp reply