Re: DefaultMaskingFormatter

2023-10-21 Thread first last
Hi - Thanks for getting back to me so quickly - it's not a blocker, more of a question. Apologies for the long answer There's no special message content, and I had a (messy, admittedly, but small CamelCustomLogMask) workaround for XML. The workaround used the default implementation, and

Re: DefaultMaskingFormatter

2023-10-21 Thread Claus Ibsen
Hi Log masking is only a best effort. What kind of message content do you have, can you post an example. Also tell us what Camel version you use. And try with the latest release also. If you have a very special message content then you can also implement your own message formatter and do your

DefaultMaskingFormatter

2023-10-21 Thread first last
Hello, When masking is enabled on a log statement that formats the entire exchange, patterns used to identify message type (e.g. source.startsWith("<")) fail, and the whole message body is logged. I am unsure if this is a known issue, of I have configured masking incorrectly. Best regards