Hi Willem and Claus,
many thank you for fix and JIRA issue too.
I felt that one possibility, was to don't register synchronization at all
(like was in version 2.12.2), but I wasn't sure with this option (mainly in
context of CAMEL-7055).
--
View this message in context:
for any feedback.
Radek Kraus.
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/HttpProducer-endpoint-with-unlimited-limited-redelivery-memory-leak-tp5760285.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Yes, I know it. It is enough to use second variant (the commented one) of
bean component binding. I have already used it.
I want only to know if using of simple language (${body}) is a problem,
which should be fixed. I will create the JIRA ticket, how Claus suggested.
Thanks all for help.
--
The JIRA issue was create https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-6810.
Thanks for help.
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Bean-component-Bean-Binding-Body-as-InputStream-parametr-specified-as-body-in-route-tp5740656p5740741.html
Sent from the Camel - Users
