Re: Performance and MessageSupport.getBody (1.6.0)

2009-03-02 Thread paquettd
I'm not sure if it makes a difference but I'm not using JMS anywhere. In fact in this test everything is using direct. Is there something I can do in the Spring DSL to hint to Camel that there is no conversion necessary? Claus Ibsen-2 wrote: On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 5:54 PM, paquettd

Re: @RecipientList and ProducerTemplate (Camel 1.6 and 1.5)

2009-02-27 Thread paquettd
... after all, what if I sent to 2 outputs; which answer could it possibly respond with. Claus Ibsen-2 wrote: On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 6:45 PM, paquettd dan.paque...@lmco.com wrote: Looking into this more it seems to be because I am ending up in a BeanProcessor. Line 120 of the bean processor

@RecipientList and ProducerTemplate (Camel 1.6 and 1.5)

2009-02-26 Thread paquettd
I'm seeing a behavior in camel 1.6 I don't understand. when I used the producerTemplate to kickoff a workflow that includes a @RecipientList component I seem to get back the result of the recipient list... but my other services end up being called (and their results simply lost to the ether).

Re: @RecipientList and ProducerTemplate (Camel 1.6 and 1.5)

2009-02-26 Thread paquettd
is there a way for me to change the Processor being used? Or declare my @RecipientList pojo within the RecipientList tag. paquettd wrote: I'm seeing a behavior in camel 1.6 I don't understand. when I used the producerTemplate to kickoff a workflow that includes a @RecipientList component I seem to get