and with seda, the only
diference is that with SEDA, if I restart the server, all messages are
lost!!!
thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-route-stop-consuming-tp5736611p5736801.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com
activemq:mail with seda:mail
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-route-stop-consuming-tp5736611p5736714.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com
(http://Nabble.com).
11:32:53,140 INFO [org.apache.camel.impl.DefaultShutdownStrategy]
-
Waiting as there are still 2262 inflight and pending exchanges to complete,
timeout in 287 seconds.
Any idea?
Thanks a lot
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-route-stop-consuming
, and to prevent spam I put the delay.
I notice that the route stop workin with activemq and with seda, the only
diference is that with SEDA, if I restart the server, all messages are
lost!!!
thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-route-stop-consuming
);
from( direct:mail01 )
.beanRef( envioMailProcessor01, processLoadbalancer )
.
.
.
The envioMailProcesorXXsends a mail to the user.
Using seda, only replace activemq:mail with seda:mail
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-route
inflight and pending exchanges to complete,
timeout in 287 seconds.
Any idea?
Thanks a lot
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-route-stop-consuming-tp5736611.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com
(http