Hi Claus,
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> Hmm I am not aware of such.
>
> camel-levedb is using same principle as the leveldb store in AMQ
> http://activemq.apache.org/leveldb-store.html
>
> And allows concurrent and distributed reads/writes to the shared
> store. eg use a s
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Raul Kripalani wrote:
> Careful, HawtDB is deprecated, as advertised in the camel-hawtdb component
> page. Unfortunately, the warning doesn't render in a shaded box any longer
> (due to some recent Confluence migration), so it's easy to miss it. Sorry
> about that.
Hi Tom,
> Since we're going to run our system distributed (multiple containers in
> Fuse Fabric) we need an alternative to the default
> MemoryAggregationRepository.
As Raul said, JDBC is the only real distributed option for a while.
Keep in mind however that even if SQL performance might not be
Careful, HawtDB is deprecated, as advertised in the camel-hawtdb component
page. Unfortunately, the warning doesn't render in a shaded box any longer
(due to some recent Confluence migration), so it's easy to miss it. Sorry
about that.
LevelDB is recommended instead, but the technology has two lim
Hi camel-users,
Since we're going to run our system distributed (multiple containers in
Fuse Fabric) we need an alternative to the default
MemoryAggregationRepository.
Although we found it awkward that the Hazelcast component only offers an
IdempotentRepository and no AggregationRepository we fou
