Re: Mixing UnitOfWork/Synchronization and onException() Handling

2011-08-17 Thread Claus Ibsen
Frankly its not a cool answer. Its just that people should have a bit more patience when they post for help in one community. And not cross posts in many communities, as it spread the conversation. And for people who take the time to help at X, would have to do the same at place Y etc. I personall

Re: Mixing UnitOfWork/Synchronization and onException() Handling

2011-08-17 Thread Claus Ibsen
Hi This is my reply from the Fuse forum http://fusesource.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=3256&tstart=0 If you use JMS then the JMS broker has built in support for error queues (dead letter channel). So its in fact better to use that, instead of having Camel sending the message back to the erro

Re: Mixing UnitOfWork/Synchronization and onException() Handling

2011-08-17 Thread Claus Ibsen
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 3:37 PM, bvahdat wrote: > Claus, > That was the coolest answer I've ever seen by you. > It seems that the "Big Brother" is watching/tracking you everywhere. > I'm a borg ... ehh bot, i'm not a human ;) > Regards, Babak > > -- > View this message in context: > http://cam

Re: Mixing UnitOfWork/Synchronization and onException() Handling

2011-08-17 Thread bvahdat
Claus, That was the coolest answer I've ever seen by you. It seems that the "Big Brother" is watching/tracking you everywhere. Regards, Babak -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Mixing-UnitOfWork-Synchronization-and-onException-Handling-tp4708180p4708244.html Sen

Re: Mixing UnitOfWork/Synchronization and onException() Handling

2011-08-17 Thread Claus Ibsen
Posted to this forum as well http://fusesource.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=3256&tstart=0 Where this is already being discussed. On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 3:24 PM, rschetti wrote: > Experienced Camel Users, > > I am a relatively new Camel user. I have successfully setup the "happy case" > where