nner using DSL or Spring
>>> DSL (with no need to worry about the plumbing code) then Camel is a good
>>> choice.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Ashwin...
>>>
>>>
>>> AnuragS wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Does it make sense to use Apache Camel for making asynchronous calls?
>>>> Or the old fashioned MoM is good enough.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Using-Apache-Camel-Asynchronously-tp22111353p22212493.html
Sent from the Camel - Users (activemq) mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
;> the old fashioned MoM is good enough.
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
-
---
Ashwin Karpe, Principal Consultant, PS - Opensource Center of Competence
Progress Software Corporation
14 Oak Park Drive
Bedford, MA 01730
---
+1-972-304-9084 (Office)
+1-972-971-1700 (Mobile)
Blog: http://opensourceknowledge.blogspot.com/
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Using-Apache-Camel-Asynchronously-tp22111353p22167997.html
Sent from the Camel - Users (activemq) mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
el for making asynchronous calls? Or
>> the old fashioned MoM is good enough.
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Using-Apache-Camel-Asynchronously-tp22111353s22882p22150662.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ice)
+1-972-971-1700 (Mobile)
Blog: http://opensourceknowledge.blogspot.com/
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Using-Apache-Camel-Asynchronously-tp22111353s22882p22115100.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Does it make sense to use Apache Camel for making asynchronous calls? Or the
old fashioned MoM is good enough.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Using-Apache-Camel-Asynchronously-tp22111353s22882p22111353.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.