ange a lot to use SQS)
>
> regards
> D
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/When-to-use-AWS-SQS-tp5737514p5737518.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
*Christian Posta*
http://www.christianposta.com/blog
twitter: @christianposta
value" in using AWS SQS.
> As mentioned - we are able to achieve HA & HS using current architecture -
> so trying to understand if there is any value in using AWS SQS. (in which
> case my architecture will change a lot to use SQS)
>
> regards
> D
>
>
>
> --
&
p://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/When-to-use-AWS-SQS-tp5737514p5737518.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
can understand it provides a messaging framework - but does it really
> provide any value in my architecture.
>
>
> regards
> D
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/When-to-use-AWS-SQS-tp5737514.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com
> (http://Nabble.com).
ring and I have multiple EC2s running - I do have HA.
So do I really need to use Amazon SQS here?
I can understand it provides a messaging framework - but does it really
provide any value in my architecture.
regards
D
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/When-to-u
