Hi ,
By using the following property 'useAsyncSend' activemq performance has
been improved.
-
Regards
kiran Reddy
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-Activemq-performance-suggestions-tp5734508p5734637.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-Activemq-performance-suggestions-tp5734508.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Claus Ibsen
-
www.camelone.org: The open source integration conference.
Red Hat, Inc
://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-Activemq-performance-suggestions-tp5734508p5734577.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
kiran Reddy
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-Activemq-performance-suggestions-tp5734508.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
Regards
kiran Reddy
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-Activemq-performance-suggestions-tp5734508.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
*Christian Posta*
http://www.christianposta.com/blog
twitter: @christianposta
this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-Activemq-performance-suggestions-tp5734508p5734533.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
(MainDummyProcessor.class)
.to(netty:tcp://10.44.71.67:7004?textline=true);
-
Regards
kiran Reddy
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-Activemq-performance-suggestions-tp5734508p5734533.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Ya I agree jms will add little overhead,
But based on the results I got TCP is 10x faster.
Generally will there be this much difference??
-
Regards
kiran Reddy
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-Activemq-performance-suggestions-tp5734508p5734539.html
