Re: java dsl vs blueprint xml

2015-12-16 Thread Matt Sicker
o that makes it a bit > easier. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/java-dsl-vs-blueprint-xml-tp5775085p5775124.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>

RE: java dsl vs blueprint xml

2015-12-16 Thread souciance
I wouldn't mind using it but considering that most of the books and documentation is using the java or blueprint dsl so that makes it a bit easier. -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/java-dsl-vs-blueprint-xml-tp5775085p5775124.html Sent from the Camel - Users

RE: java dsl vs blueprint xml

2015-12-15 Thread raffi.onjava
? Do you as Camel users/developers have any specific thoughts on this? Best Souciance -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/java-dsl-vs-blueprint-xml-tp5775085.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

java dsl vs blueprint xml

2015-12-15 Thread souciance
as Camel users/developers have any specific thoughts on this? Best Souciance -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/java-dsl-vs-blueprint-xml-tp5775085.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: java dsl vs blueprint xml

2015-12-15 Thread Daniel Lamb
s/developers have any specific thoughts on this? >> >> Best >> Souciance >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/java-dsl-vs-blueprint-xml-tp5775085.html >> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > -- > Christian Schneider > http://www.liquid-reality.de > > Open Source Architect > http://www.talend.com >

Re: java dsl vs blueprint xml

2015-12-15 Thread souciance
I have used direct-vm for that for some integrations, only difference is that with direct-vm you get multiple camel-context. I haven't tried your spring example in blueprint to see if it works though. -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/java-dsl-vs-blueprint-xml

Re: java dsl vs blueprint xml

2015-12-15 Thread Christian Schneider
-vs-blueprint-xml-tp5775085p5775097.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Christian Schneider http://www.liquid-reality.de Open Source Architect http://www.talend.com

Re: java dsl vs blueprint xml

2015-12-15 Thread Christian Schneider
in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/java-dsl-vs-blueprint-xml-tp5775085.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Christian Schneider http://www.liquid-reality.de Open Source Architect http://www.talend.com

Re: java dsl vs blueprint xml

2015-12-15 Thread Alexey Markevich
2) Unlike in the java dsl, you cannot split the routes into several files and import them. you can use http://camel.apache.org/direct-vm.html or http://camel.apache.org/vm.html to communicate beetwen different routes; you can share single Camel context between route builders (Spring example):

Re: java dsl vs blueprint xml

2015-12-15 Thread souciance
step deploy to a docker container. Ok so it seems the best approach seems to be a mix of both where blueprint can be used to register services. -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/java-dsl-vs-blueprint-xml-tp5775085p5775094.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing

Re: java dsl vs blueprint xml

2015-12-15 Thread Christian Schneider
.465427.n5.nabble.com/java-dsl-vs-blueprint-xml-tp5775085p5775091.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Christian Schneider http://www.liquid-reality.de Open Source Architect http://www.talend.com

Re: java dsl vs blueprint xml

2015-12-15 Thread souciance
in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/java-dsl-vs-blueprint-xml-tp5775085p5775095.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.