Re: JMS pub/sub (using Camel) performance issue with MQ in XA transactions

2019-09-03 Thread Benoit Fortin
Hi, We do need XA as the client application is doing 2 phase commit in (1) the subscription and (2) a database. On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 14:49 Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi, > > What about using pure ACK mode ? > > You can see an example with queue (same can be applied to topic) here: >

Re: JMS pub/sub (using Camel) performance issue with MQ in XA transactions

2019-09-03 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi, What about using pure ACK mode ? You can see an example with queue (same can be applied to topic) here: http://blog.nanthrax.net/?p=820 My point is: do you need XA as AFAIU you are using only JMS as resource (XA is required when you want to use the same transaction with different backends

JMS pub/sub (using Camel) performance issue with MQ in XA transactions

2019-09-03 Thread Benoit Fortin
We have a java application doing JMS subscriptions that is using Camel as its JMS provider. The application is subscribing to a topic using XA. It consumes 1 message in the queue, and then closes the XA transaction (each message is part of an XA transaction). Then the application re-attaches

R: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Camel 3.0.0-RC1 (Release Candidate 1) Released

2019-09-03 Thread Andrea Cosentino
Yes, se are working on that too. Thanks Inviato da Yahoo Mail su Android Il mar, 3 set, 2019 alle 10:41, Knut-Håvard Aksnes ha scritto: There seems to be a bug in the way the release notes are listed on the Apache Camel News page, the date is wrong. (In the future) I suspect month number

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Camel 3.0.0-RC1 (Release Candidate 1) Released

2019-09-03 Thread Knut-Håvard Aksnes
There seems to be a bug in the way the release notes are listed on the Apache Camel News page, the date is wrong. (In the future) I suspect month number is shown instead of day of month. man. 2. sep. 2019, 19.51 skrev Gregor Zurowski : > The Camel community announces the immediate availability