BUG - RouteDefinition doesnt have routeId when using REST DSL

2023-01-23 Thread Nikola Glidzic
Hello Camel crew, I will explain in details what I have discovered, how to reproduce it and potential idea for fixing the issue. I am using Camel version 3.18.4. In my code, I have Camel unit tests where I extend CamelTestSupport. I am testing routes from one single RouteBuilder object which

Re: tag contains a version range in features.xml

2023-01-23 Thread Andrea Cosentino
Please try again and I'll try to create an account. For this particular case, issue shouldn't be needed, since 3.8 is not an LTS release a we won't release patch releases for that. Il giorno lun 23 gen 2023 alle ore 13:38 Dmitri T ha scritto: > I am a new reporter and did not get a response

Re: tag contains a version range in features.xml

2023-01-23 Thread Dmitri T
I am a new reporter and did not get a response for the requested Jira account... пн, 23 янв. 2023 г. в 15:16, Andrea Cosentino : > > As far as I know it's possible: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-5999 > > You could open an issue for fixing this on Camel 3.x > > Il giorno lun 23 gen

Re: tag contains a version range in features.xml

2023-01-23 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi, Agree it is always saner to pin a tested version than using ranges which, even if supported by feature service, generally do not give any runtime guarantee until you lock them elsewhere so probably better to release something validated than something which *should* be fine IMHO - in

Re: tag contains a version range in features.xml

2023-01-23 Thread Andrea Cosentino
As far as I know it's possible: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-5999 You could open an issue for fixing this on Camel 3.x Il giorno lun 23 gen 2023 alle ore 13:12 Dmitri T ha scritto: > I believe it's legit to have a version range for tag, but > not for . When you add a

Re: tag contains a version range in features.xml

2023-01-23 Thread Andrea Cosentino
By the way, with the newer LTS versions we have only a fixed version for cxf and a range for pax-cdi https://github.com/apache/camel-karaf/blob/camel-karaf-3.20.x/platforms/karaf/features/src/main/resources/features.xml#L21-L22 Il giorno lun 23 gen 2023 alle ore 13:16 Andrea Cosentino ha

Re: tag contains a version range in features.xml

2023-01-23 Thread Dmitri T
I believe it's legit to have a version range for tag, but not for . When you add a repository, you provide a concrete url to maven repo. пн, 23 янв. 2023 г. в 14:21, Andrea Cosentino : > > This has been done here: >

Re: tag contains a version range in features.xml

2023-01-23 Thread Andrea Cosentino
This has been done here: https://github.com/apache/camel-karaf/commit/79dfa35ff299a779687eb85e7bc34785969cfe16 It's legit to have a version range and not a concrete version. Il giorno lun 23 gen 2023 alle ore 12:15 Dmitri T ha scritto: > Hello. > > Starting from Camel 3.8 features.xml contains

tag contains a version range in features.xml

2023-01-23 Thread Dmitri T
Hello. Starting from Camel 3.8 features.xml contains a version range inside instead of a concrete version: mvn:org.apache.cxf.karaf/apache-cxf/[3,4)/xml/features mvn:org.apache.jclouds.karaf/jclouds-karaf/[2.1,2.1]/xml/features mvn:org.ops4j.pax.cdi/pax-cdi-features/[1,2)/xml/features