a message was sent.
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Multiple-camel-producers-instantiated-tp5794353p5794395.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ed.
> Could someone help me with this?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.
> com/Multiple-camel-producers-instantiated-tp5794353.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
it is released. Because of the
asynchronized approach there are multiple producer objects instantiated.
Could someone help me with this?
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Multiple-camel-producers-instantiated-tp5794353.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing
Hi Charles,
Can you help me with this issue. I still couldn't find a solution for this.
Thanks!
Regards,
Shiva
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Multiple-camel-producers-instantiated-tp5781152p5791972.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive
eateProducer() is also called from ProducerCache.java
Thanks,
Shiva
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Multiple-camel-producers-instantiated-tp5781152p5781155.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Multiple-camel-producers-instantiated-tp5781152.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Charles Moulliard
Apache Committer & PMC / Architect @RedHat
Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.github.io
this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Multiple-camel-producers-instantiated-tp5781152.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
