回复: 关于域和账号的却别

在CloudStack中“帐户”是云资源管理的基本单位，而“用户”是做为“帐户”别名形式存在的。同一个帐户中的用户之间的资源不会隔离，生产环境中我们一般会给公司内部的一个部门，或者一个小组分配一个帐户。 CloudStack的“域”是一组“帐户”的集合，在CloudStack初始化完成后默认会建立ROOT域，即根域。以后建立的域都以树的方式组织，在生产环境中可以为相对独立的部门或者其他城市的部门分配一个域。每个域都有一个域管理员，域管理员的权限高于其他用户。 fei168die 发件人： wanghaicheng2004 发送时间： 2013-06-27 09:45 收件人：

Re: 回复：以后安装xenserver还需要每年申请一次license么

有谁用过开源后最新发布的XenServer XenServer-6.2.0-install-cd.iso 我们下载了装机器，xenserver装一半就装不下了，有人安装成功过没？ 有人用这个版本的xenserver和cloudstack集成成功没？ 2013-07-03 陈珂 发件人： WXR 发送时间： 2013-06-28 14:16:38 收件人： users-cn 抄送： 主题： 回复：以后安装xenserver还需要每年申请一次license么 不用license,用xencenter看到的期限那里是永久 --

Re: 回复：以后安装xenserver还需要每年申请一次licenseô

1、已在生产环境中使用，挺不错的，可以设置动态内存、可以查看虚拟机一年内 的运行 状态、没有license的限制、可以移动虚拟1机磁盘到其他存储上等等 2、CS4.1暂时不支持XS6.2.0 ！ 于 2013/7/3 15:09, 陈珂 写道: 有谁用过开源后最新发布的XenServer XenServer-6.2.0-install-cd.iso 我们下载了装机器，xenserver装一半就装不下了，有人安装成功过没？ 有人用这个版本的xenserver和cloudstack集成成功没？ 2013-07-03 陈珂 发件人： WXR 发送时间：

回复: Re：以后安装xenserver还需要每年申请一次license么

cloudstack4.0管理xenserver目前应该不支持6.2的版本 fei168die 发件人： 陈珂 发送时间： 2013-07-03 15:09 收件人： users-cn 主题： Re: 回复：以后安装xenserver还需要每年申请一次license么 有谁用过开源后最新发布的XenServer XenServer-6.2.0-install-cd.iso 我们下载了装机器，xenserver装一半就装不下了，有人安装成功过没？ 有人用这个版本的xenserver和cloudstack集成成功没？ 2013-07-03 陈珂 发件人： WXR

Re: Re: 回复：以后安装xenserver还需要每年申请一次licenseô

CS4.1暂时不支持XS6.2.0 ！ 那我能否把当前的xs6.0激活成永久使用呢，现在还是一年的license 2013-07-03 陈珂 发件人： Deason Yang 发送时间： 2013-07-03 17:16:28 收件人： users-cn 抄送： 主题： Re: 回复：以后安装xenserver还需要每年申请一次licenseô 1、已在生产环境中使用，挺不错的，可以设置动态内存、可以查看虚拟机一年内 的运行 状态、没有license的限制、可以移动虚拟1机磁盘到其他存储上等等 2、CS4.1暂时不支持XS6.2.0 ！ 于

系统虚机启动不起来日志报错

com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create a deployment for VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-187-VM]Scope=interface com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=2 at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:734) at

kvm agent端日志报错

agent 端报错 2013-07-03 23:36:05,675 ERROR [utils.nio.NioConnection] (Agent-Selector:null) Unable to connect to remote 2013-07-03 23:36:10,676 INFO [utils.nio.NioClient] (Agent-Selector:null) Connecting to localhost:8250 2013-07-03 23:36:10,677 ERROR [utils.nio.NioConnection]

Virtual router failed

Hi. I have problem with create first instance at my CS4.1. SSVM and CPVM have been deployed without any problem/ But when i create instance in log i have 2013-07-03 11:18:39,039 DEBUG [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-175:null) 1. The VM r-21-VM is in Starting state. 2013-07-03

[DOCS] Quick Install Guide for 4.1.x

Hi, Meng Han from the Google Summer of Code project contributed the QIG for 4.1.x I put it on-line for review at: http://people.apache.org/~sebgoa/Apache_CloudStack-4.1.1-qig-en-US.pdf Some of you may want to have a look. If you find any issues please enter a doc bug at:

[TRANSLATION] Update

Hi folks, The 4.2 branch has been cut and work is in progress for this new release. The translation work is on-going but I wanted to give everyone a quick update. The UI translation is doing great, see the completion at: http://awesomescreenshot.com/08b1gqa1bb The Quick Install Guide (aka

Guest network configuration XenServer

Hi, could someone give advice or some example how to configure guest network on Xenserver? I have some trouble with this problem. I configure line name=name-of-vlan Tags=tags-of-vlan network setting like internal end have ERROR [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-419:null) Network is

password enabled templates

Hi all, i have created a new template using sshkey pair, when i use same template in deployVirtualMachine and get job status using queryAsyncJobStatus i get password in password field of response and also get password in getVMPassword but both are different and i am not able to login to vm using

Re: password enabled templates

Hi, getVMPassword returns the encrypted password. Is your template has cloud-set-guest-password script ? Copy the cloud-set-guest-password script into guest vm and create template from it. Set password enable in this template and deploy vm with it.

Re: Problematic firewall rules for basic zone with no security groups

Hi, Please share host iptables (iptables -L -nv)rules on pastebin.com Thanks, Jayapal On 21-Jun-2013, at 10:07 PM, Nick Wales n...@nickwales.co.uk wrote: Having recently upgraded my hosts to 4.1 I am encountering this issue again. To confirm, the zone has no security groups however I am

Oracle VM Integration with CloudStack

Hi Guys, I'm very interested on the integration of CloudStack with Oracle VM 3.x or Oracle Enterprise Manager 12c. In the document Apache_CloudStack-4.1.0-Release_Notes-en-US-3.pdf I didn't found Oracle VM 3.x on the list of the supported hypervisors but I found a reference of a fix

Re: System integrity check failed. Refuse to startup

On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 10:31:24PM +0800, WXR wrote: The cloudstack-management service can not start normally. The logs indicate the reason but I don't know how to get rid of the issue. 2013-07-02 19:26:09,078 INFO [utils.component.ComponentContext] (Timer-1:null) Running

Re: Oracle VM Integration with CloudStack

On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 07:44:31AM -0700, Alexandre Sousa wrote: Hi Guys, I'm very interested on the integration of CloudStack with Oracle VM 3.x or Oracle Enterprise Manager 12c. In the document Apache_CloudStack-4.1.0-Release_Notes-en-US-3.pdf I didn't found Oracle VM 3.x on the list

Network offering Public IP

Hello everyone Is there is any way that I could assign a public IP to an instance, I'm not using a basic zone, I have advanced zone setup. What do I need to do? Thank you

RE: Network offering Public IP

Dean, You can simply setup the Firewall Rules and Port Forwarding to pass traffic to a particular VM, or if you want a 1-2-1 mapping, acquire a 2nd Public IP and then enable Static NAT, this will map a Public IP to a single VM, but you will still need to configure the Firewall Rules. Regards

Re: Network offering Public IP

Yes it can be done let me get the notes Regards, Jonathan Bastin - Reply message - From: Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com To: users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Network offering Public IP Date: Wed, Jul 3, 2013 17:12 Hello everyone Is there is any

Re: Network offering Public IP

Thanks Geoff, Jonathan do you have another idea of achieving the same task? Thank you On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Jonathan Bastin jonathan.bas...@peerpointinternet.co.uk wrote: Yes it can be done let me get the notes Regards, Jonathan Bastin - Reply message - From:

Re: Network offering Public IP

I do have it with a live IP directly assigned to the instance without the router being spun up. I will create a quick guide but basically you have to create a shared network and allow users to use it. Only issue is all users are on the same network which will create certain security holes. If

Primary storage failure

Hello everyone I'm testing failure scenarios, and I have noticed that as soon as the primary storage gets offline. cloudstack management server seems to think that the hypervisor is not responding and it will reboot the node, if you have number of of nodes it will eventually reboot all of them.

Re: Virtual router failed

Yeap, i found solution in CS4.2 bugtracker 0_o In db cloud do update physical_network_traffic_types set xen_network_label=NULL; On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:17 PM, Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com wrote: XenCP 1.6 is not fully supported, and from the logs it sounds like you have issue with

Re: Virtual router failed

Did you actually managed to get everything to work on XenCP 1.6? are you setting up advanced zone? or basic? On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Anton Rubets plejik@gmail.com wrote: Yeap, i found solution in CS4.2 bugtracker 0_o In db cloud do update physical_network_traffic_types set

RE: Network offering Public IP

Another option would be to create a new 'Isolated Network' offering, with the Specify VLAN, DHCP, DNS options ticked, but nothing else. Use this to create a new network, and whilst there will be a VR it will not act as a Router as we did not enable 'Source NAT'. When you create the Network,

RE: Primary storage failure

Dean, I am guessing you are using NFS for your Primary Storage. This is actually 'by design'. The logic is that if the storage goes offline, then all VMs must have also failed, and a 'forced' reboot of the Host 'might' automatically fix things. This is great if you only have one Primary

Re: Primary storage failure

This warrants a bug IMO. --David On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Dean, I am guessing you are using NFS for your Primary Storage. This is actually 'by design'. The logic is that if the storage goes offline, then all VMs must have

Re: Primary storage failure

Geoff thanks for your help, just wondering if this change will have any impact on HA operations that cloudstack offers for HA instances (if one of the nodes dies, vm will restart on another node). Thanks again for your help On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:39 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:

Re: Virtual router failed

I am use advanced zone. Now i am stuck more than 6 time,SSVM CPVM start, VR start, network tag problem, but almost done. Now the last problem with instance creation and i think then i can say that i finish him. And some day ago i saw that XenServer now free =( On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:28 PM,

Re: Virtual router failed

http://blogs.citrix.com/2013/06/25/xenserver-6-2-is-now-fully-open-source/ or i am wrong =( On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com wrote: basic version of Xenserver always been free :) On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Anton Rubets plejik@gmail.com wrote: I

Re: Primary storage failure

Hi Dean, This will not affect the HA failover in the event of a Host failure Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44(0)20 3603 0542tel:+442036030542 | S: +44(0)20 3603 0540tel:+442036030540 | M: +44(0)7968161581tel:+447968161581

Re: Primary storage failure

Hi David, I recall reading somewhere a while back that they were considering including this as an option via Global Settings, where you could turn it on or off, but I'm not sure if it ever got anywhere. Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44(0)20 3603 0542tel:+442036030542

Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

Due to object store refactor, Swift is broken. The reason, is that, we only have S3 test environment in our lab, so only S3 is tested for now. Before adding the feature back, I'd better ask from, the community, do we want to support Swift? If so, which version of Swift? This will take some

CY13-Q2 Community Analysis — OpenStack vs OpenNebula vs Eucalyptus vs CloudStack

Hi all, The CY13-Q2 Community Analysis -- OpenStack vs OpenNebula vs Eucalyptus vs CloudStack is now available. This is the 7th edition of this quarterly community analysis. English Version: CY13-Q2 Community Analysis — OpenStack vs OpenNebula vs Eucalyptus vs CloudStack Chinese Version:

Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

There was someone in the community using swift in production and had volunteered to do some testing. See http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3350 On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 09:57:14PM +, Angeline Shen wrote: Hi Edison, Anthony, Developers who are interested: I tested Swift