回复: Re: about cloud_usage

cloud-usage服务我是开启的，在cloud-usage库中只有usage_job这个表下有一条数据，其他表中的数据都是空的 lifanch...@travelsky.com 发件人： Jijun 发送时间： 2013-07-29 14:34 收件人： users-cn 主题： Re:回复: about cloud_usage On 07/29/2013 01:01 PM, lifanch...@travelsky.com wrote: 我在使用cloudstack的统计功能时，cloud_usage这个库里一直没有数据，cloud-usage服务是装在管理节点上的

Re: about cloud_usage

你用的是哪种网络？basic还是advanced？ cloud库的user_statistics下有数据吗？ 什么hypervisor？ 相关配置最好一次性说清楚。 在 2013年7月29日上午6:39，lifanch...@travelsky.com lifanch...@travelsky.com写道： ** 我在使用cloudstack的统计功能时，cloud_usage这个库里一直没有数据，cloud-usage服务是装在管理节点上的 -- 防火墙我是直接关闭了的，全局配置如下：

Re: Re: about cloud_usage

不支持basic网络。 cloudstack是从virtual router取流量数据，但是basic网络的流量不从virtual router走。 你可以写个脚本直接从host取数据。 在 2013年7月29日上午10:36，lifanch...@travelsky.com lifanch...@travelsky.com写道： 1.基本网络 2.cloud db 中的user_statistics下有一条数据 3.xenserver lifanch...@travelsky.com 发件人： Wei ZHOU 发送时间： 2013-07-29 16:30

回复: Re: about cloud_usage

不是很清楚，只是在删除SR的时候用过几个命令。 lifanch...@travelsky.com 发件人： Wei ZHOU 发送时间： 2013-07-29 17:09 收件人： users-cn 主题： Re: Re: about cloud_usage xenserver的命令你知道吧？ 在 2013年7月29日上午11:04，lifanch...@travelsky.com lifanch...@travelsky.com写道： 哦，谢谢你了，WeiZHOU 我也是刚开始做这个，你能不能具体点如何从host中获取。

Re: Big Switch Floodlight

On Jul 25, 2013, at 11:17 AM, Adrian Lewis adr...@alsiconsulting.co.uk wrote: Hi All, Just wondering if the Bigswitch integration for CS requires the Big Virtual Switch component or whether this is just a complimentary aspect? I ask this as I’m wondering if the future holds the

Re: HA in CS 4.1

FYR, I have done some similar tests several weeks ago to test the host HA functionality. CS 4.0.2 + XenServer 6.0.2: Works as expected. HA-enabled VMs (including System VMs) were automatically restarted on HA-dedicated hosts. CS 4.1.0 + XCP 1.6: No HA thing happened at all much like what you

RE: Big Switch Floodlight

Hi Sebastien, Many thanks for the info - much appreciated. If I can chip in I will, but other than about month of Fortran I did at University almost 20 years ago I've never done any programming so I'd be a bit lost I'm afraid. I'll keep my eye out for any developments on this front and may be

RE: Networking config question

Hi Bryce, The preferred method of assigning traffic is storage and management traffic can be assigned with ip ranges from private network 10.1.4.0/23. Guest traffic can be with default CIDR what CS gives while deploying zone and public traffic can be with your public network 192.168.56.0/24

Re: Big Switch Floodlight

Hi Adrian, I'm working on GSoC project relevant to cloudstack's sdn controller. Currently there are some sdn plugins including NiciraNvp and BigswitchVns. Floodlight haven't been integrated to CS yet. I'm working on two things: + integrating Opendaylight controller + improving Cloudstack native

Re: Reg: Multiple ips server for cloudstack in Basic zone

Multiple ip address per nic is added in 4.2. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-24 Thanks, Jayapal On 29-Jul-2013, at 1:05 PM, prak...@assistanz.com wrote: Hi, I am running cloudstack 4.1 in my environment and configured basic zone. we have not identified any new seconadry

Re: HA in CS 4.1

Great information, thanks so much for sharing!! On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 4:28 AM, Ryan Lei ryan...@cht.com.tw wrote: FYR, I have done some similar tests several weeks ago to test the host HA functionality. CS 4.0.2 + XenServer 6.0.2: Works as expected. HA-enabled VMs (including System VMs)

Re: HA not working - CloudStack 4.1.0 and KVM hypervisor hosts

there are workaround / database update to declare a host died so that HA operations can be triggered? 2013/7/25 Lennert den Teuling lenn...@pcextreme.nl Op 25-07-13 07:48, Bryan Whitehead schreef: Starting off, there is never going to be a way to conclusively decide if a host is down.

Re: HA in CS 4.1

Salvatore, Please go vote for and add details to this bug: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3535 -Bryan On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Salvatore Sciacco scia...@iperweb.com wrote: I've powered off a host of a KVM cluster to simulate the server failure and I'm experiencing the

RE: Networking config question

Hi Sanjeev, Thanks for your reply. I had been associating private network with the IP space allocated to eth0, then trying to divide up that IP space among the various types of traffic (...because the wiki told me to [1]) If I understand what you are saying correctly, the division between

Re: Setting up networking similar to VirtualBox

you'll probably need to have a couple interfaces (or bridges) say for example Outside and Inside (where the guests will live). You'll need to setup ip forwarding so that your traffic on inside gets routed out via Outside. I've dont this a long while back but have since forgotten the gritty

Re: Reg: Multiple ips server for cloudstack in Basic zone

Hi Prakash, My comments inline. Thanks Jayapal On 30-Jul-2013, at 10:06 AM, prak...@assistanz.com wrote: Hi Jayapal, 1.In cloudstack 4.2 have new feature per nic have multiple ips address. That is good. 2.In basic zone, we need multiple PUBLIC ipaddress per nic not private ip address

Re: CS 4.1 + vSphere 5.1 - System VMs issue

Hello everybody, I'm recently having issues about the ability to manage the system VMs (Console Proxy + Secondary Storage VM); I've got the following configuration: * Cloudstack 4.1 * VMware vSphere 5.1 * Standard networking configuration * vSwitch0 on the public network (Guest network)