Hello Ilya
I submit an issue describing the bug:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4735 (I picked CS version
4.1.0 as 4.1.1 is reported as non existent, but I've seen this behavior
before since version 3).
I followed your indications but it didn't work. After changing those
records
It seems the issue has disappeared after harmonizing all kvm storage pool
definitions.
Thanks!
From: Sanjeev Neelarapu
To: Nikolay Kabadjov ; "users@cloudstack.apache.org"
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 9:58 AM
Subject: RE: Storage pool not found: no st
In addition I always get the the same exception when the allocated mem comes to
about 82 or 83 %
regardless of the service offering I am using to deploy a VM, even with the
smallest one.
Are there any rules or something?
From: Nikolay Kabadjov
To: Richard
Hi Travis,
We don't support multiple subnets in the same vlan for public IP ranges. Since
all the subnets you are using are untagged, all the CIDRs will be treated as
part of same vlan and CS throws error when you try to add multiple subnets.
This feature may be supported in future versions of
Yes Kirk, I did
From: Kirk Jantzer
To: Cloudstack users mailing list ; Nikolay
Kabadjov
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 5:50 PM
Subject: Re: mem.overprovisioning.facto and KVM
Did you restart the management service after making the change?
Regards,
My comments inline
-Harikrishna
On 25-Sep-2013, at 10:18 AM, Indra Pramana wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> During my (failed) upgrade attempt from CloudStack 4.1.1 to 4.2.0 early
> this week, I noted that CloudStack management server will automatically
> detect the database version and upgrade the data
Dear all,
During my (failed) upgrade attempt from CloudStack 4.1.1 to 4.2.0 early
this week, I noted that CloudStack management server will automatically
detect the database version and upgrade the database automatically.
===
2013-09-24 02:23:48,145 INFO [utils.component.ComponentContext]
(Timer
The issue is closed now.
Thanks and regards,
Abhinav
-Original Message-
From: Harikrishna Patnala
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 10:10 AM
To: Abhinav Roy
Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org; d...@cloudstack.apache.org; Radhika Puthiyetath
Subject: Re: Volunteers to Complete the 4.2 Rele
Hi Abhinav,
Can you please close this ticket it the new systemvm name changes are fixed.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3355
On 24-Sep-2013, at 8:16 PM, Abhinav Roy wrote:
> Yes Indra, It is confirmed. We have tested using below names only. It was my
> fault that I overlooke
Hi Abhinav,
Good day to you, and thank you for your two e-mail replies.
Thank you for your confirmation on the two matters, greatly appreciate it.
Cheers.
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Abhinav Roy wrote:
> Hi Indra,
>
> Yes this steps are not needed for 4.1.x to 4.2 upgrades, they are n
Hello,
Have you read this guide? is really simple
http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.1/html/Admin_Guide/about-physical-networks.html
I installed it a couple of times, not expert but if you run into any
trouble I will be happy to help a long the way.
-Motty
On Tue, Sep
Hi all,
I'm looking for someone who can/will install/set up a cloudstack.
I hope this isn't the wrong place to ask because if nothing else, I'd
appreciate some guidance.
If it is the wrong place, please steer me in the right direction.
If it's OK, then I'd REALLY like to talk with someone about
As Daan suggested, check your management server log. Per a previous thread
you started, you only have 6 hosts - do you have enough resources for 100
VMs?
Regards,
Kirk Jantzer
http://about.me/kirkjantzer
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 4:03 PM, David Ortiz wrote:
> What kind of network is your secon
What kind of network is your secondary storage hooked up with? Is it possible
you caused a dos by trying to have 100 VMs copy their templates/isos from it at
once?
> From: daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
> Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 17:12:14 +0200
> Subject: Re: "errortext": "Unable to create a deployment
Openshift, to best of my knowledge, leverages advanced SELinux rules and not
LXC for their cartridges. They presented on CCC13 and when asked why would you
not run LXC instead, response was "we don't think its mature enough"... I don't
know what to make of their response, but I guess being redh
I'm not certain if this is hypervisor specific - I've seen the same issue for
vSphere - but I though it was me, I think we may need to revise the system vm
ip space decommission process.
Shanker and/or Daniel,
Do you mind creating a ticket in issues.apache.org and write out ways to
reproduce t
On 25-Sep-2013, at 12:13 AM, Koushik Das wrote:
> You need to restart the MS in this case for local pools to show up. For hosts
> that are added after enabling local storage on the zone it gets discovered
> immediately.
>
Yep, a restart certainly fixes it.
I have opened https://issues.apache
You need to restart the MS in this case for local pools to show up. For hosts
that are added after enabling local storage on the zone it gets discovered
immediately.
On 24-Sep-2013, at 7:54 PM, Shanker Balan wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I enabled local storage on an existing zone running on XenServer
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 8:41 AM, CK wrote:
> Hi Jerry,
>
> Did you get the DevCloud appliance working on VMware Workstation?
>
> I am getting the same error as you were.
>
> Thanks
>
> CK
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 28 November 2012 1
I have a testing CloudStack install setup with 4.1.1 running on CentOS 6.4 for
both Management and KVM compute hosts.
I'm trying to add additional public IP ranges to a zone that uses Advanced
Networking and I keep getting errors.
My first range is a subset of an existing /24 we have that provi
Our environment is locked down - they disallow egress firewall for
unapproved things. Everything we want to install has to be available on our
Spacewalk server or sideloaded.
Regards,
Kirk Jantzer
http://about.me/kirkjantzer
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:58 AM, sebgoa wrote:
>
> On Sep 24, 2013
Hi Ovi
Thanks I got your mail
regards
Nasar Khan
- Original Message -
From: "Kirk Jantzer"
To: "Cloudstack users mailing list"
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 9:02:50 PM
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.0.0
Our environment is locked down - they disallow egress
On Sep 24, 2013, at 4:50 PM, Kirk Jantzer wrote:
> Chip - is there a plan to put this in the yum repo?
you don't want to use pypi ?
pip install cloudmonkey ?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Kirk Jantzer
> http://about.me/kirkjantzer
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Dean Kamali wrote:
>
>> Tha
Did you restart the management service after making the change?
Regards,
Kirk Jantzer
http://about.me/kirkjantzer
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Nikolay Kabadjov wrote:
> Hi all,
> I've noticed that increasing mem.overprovisioning.factor doesn't take
> effect?
> I mean I still see in the d
Chip - is there a plan to put this in the yum repo?
Regards,
Kirk Jantzer
http://about.me/kirkjantzer
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Dean Kamali wrote:
> Thank you very much! I look forward upgrading current release and using it
> :)
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Chip Childers >w
Hi Indra,
Yes this steps are not needed for 4.1.x to 4.2 upgrades, they are needed only
during upgrade from previous versions.
Thanks and regards,
Abhinav
-Original Message-
From: Indra Pramana [mailto:in...@sg.or.id]
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 12:14 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apac
Yes Indra, It is confirmed. We have tested using below names only. It was my
fault that I overlooked it during documentation.
Thanks and regards,
Abhinav
-Original Message-
From: Indra Pramana [mailto:in...@sg.or.id]
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 12:12 PM
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.
Hi all,
I've noticed that increasing mem.overprovisioning.factor doesn't take effect?
I mean I still see in the dashboard the exact amount of memory I have
multiplying the memory of all the hosts.
It's CS 4.1.1 with one zone, one pod, one cluster, 6 KVM hosts
Any idea?
Thanks
Niki
Hi All,
I enabled local storage on an existing zone running on XenServers. Its been 15
minutes
and no sign of local storage pools being created on the XenServers.
Do I need to do anything further to create the local pools?
Regards.
--
@shankerbalan
M: +91 98860 60539 | O: +91 (80) 67935867
sh
On 24-Sep-2013, at 6:37 PM, Daniel Hertanu wrote:
> Hello Ilya
>
> I repeated the issue by rebooting the Xen host without having it in
> maintenance mode in CS. At this moment I have the SSVM up and running and a
> virtual router (not related to the management IPs, I know). Console Proxy
> VM ca
Thank you very much! I look forward upgrading current release and using it
:)
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> The Apache CloudStack project is pleased to announce the immediate
> availability
> of the Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.0.0 release.
>
> Apache CloudStack's Cl
Hi Guys,
This is probably more XenServer related than CloudStack…
What was NOT working after the reboot:
- Traffic between VMs on XS1 and XS2
What was still WORKING after the reboot:
- Traffic between VMs on the same XS host
What I verified:
- "ovs-vsctl show" shows that the tunnel has been
The Apache CloudStack project is pleased to announce the immediate availability
of the Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.0.0 release.
Apache CloudStack's CloudMonkey is a Python-based command line utility for
interacting with Apache CloudStack IaaS clouds. The software provides
an interactive shell
The Apache CloudStack project is pleased to announce the immediate
availability of the Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.0.0 release.
Apache CloudStack's CloudMonkey is a Python-based command line utility
for interacting with Apache CloudStack IaaS clouds. The software provides
an interactive shell
Hello Ilya
I repeated the issue by rebooting the Xen host without having it in
maintenance mode in CS. At this moment I have the SSVM up and running and a
virtual router (not related to the management IPs, I know). Console Proxy
VM can't be started because:
2013-09-24 14:56:24,410 INFO [cloud.vm
Hi all,
I try to test HA on CS 4.2/KVM and I have java.lang.NullPointerException.
ENV used:
CS 4.2(rev 2963) management on centos 6.4
CS 4.2(rev 2963) agent on centos 6.4 (node1,2)
separate nfs server as primary/secondary storage
zone type: KVM
scenario:
I create several VMs with HA-enabled offe
Hi Jerry,
Did you get the DevCloud appliance working on VMware Workstation?
I am getting the same error as you were.
Thanks
CK
-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@citrix.com]
Sent: 28 November 2012 13:12
To: jerry jiang. 蒋维
Cc: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org
Hi all.
I see Secondary Storage 0.00 KB / 0.00 KB in CS 4.2 management dashboard.
Same values if I call listCapacity API:
# cloudmonkey list capacity type=6
count = 1
capacity:
capacitytotal = 0
capacityused = 0
percentused = 0
type = 6
zoneid = 4a5bc8e5-bab9-4f92-9249-d57ef8a0f9f8
zonename = F
Hi Vadim,
Let us know of any errors you may receive.
Thanks,
Marty
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk wrote:
> Thank you for this tip Marty,
>
> I have checked from the shell that both "curl" and "wget" working
> fine and I can get the image, but not only ISO , Template
No I didn't try yet, but I will.
Following the lxc and open shift projects right now and both are pretty
interesting to me since they provide a pass feeling like Heroku
> On Sep 24, 2013, at 12:08 AM, "Sebastien Goasguen" wrote:
>
>
>> On Sep 24, 2013, at 2:48 AM, Bjoern Teipel
>> wrote:
>
On Sep 24, 2013, at 2:48 AM, Bjoern Teipel
wrote:
> A question came up if LXC might be useful for cloudstack and I personally
> agree that's a pretty interesting product for all those internet guys like me
> who runs their hardware to the extreme.
> I came today across an interesting podcast
Thank you for this tip Marty,
I have checked from the shell that both "curl" and "wget" working fine
and I can get the image, but not only ISO , Templates can't be downloaded using
management console as well. I think there is global network configuration
mistake somewhere. Need to read
Autostart=no is ok. If you restart kvm host then set it to “start” using virsh
autostart command.
From the logs it looks like some issue with the primary storage. If possible
can you add another primary storage and try deploying vm?
-Sanjeev
From: Nikolay Kabadjov [mailto:niki...@yahoo.com]
Se
43 matches
Mail list logo
