Dear all,
I am now in the progress of upgrading my CloudStack from 4.1.1 to 4.2.0.
Running cloudstack-sysvmadm can restart the SSVM, but failed to restart the
CPVM and all the VRs.
[1] 3152
root@cs-mgmt-01:~/backup/20131003# tail -f sysvm.log
nohup: ignoring input
/usr/bin/cloudstack
in...@sg.or.id wrote:
Dear all,
I am now in the progress of upgrading my CloudStack from 4.1.1 to 4.2.0.
Running cloudstack-sysvmadm can restart the SSVM, but failed to restart the
CPVM and all the VRs.
[1] 3152
root@cs-mgmt-01:~/backup/20131003# tail -f sysvm.log
nohup: ignoring input
Hi,
Is it possible to assign a VM to another user through the cloudstack web
interface?
For example if I had a request from a user to have an instance deployed for
them, I would be able to deploy it as the admin and then assign it to their
account so that they would still be able to control the
cloudstack-sysvmadm can restart the SSVM, but failed to restart
the
CPVM and all the VRs.
[1] 3152
root@cs-mgmt-01:~/backup/20131003# tail -f sysvm.log
nohup: ignoring input
/usr/bin/cloudstack-sysvmadm: line 21: /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions: No
such
file or directory
Stopping
Thank for your reply, here is what i get on the logs:
2013-10-03 06:07:22,285 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-8:job-92) Cleaning up resources for the vm VM[User|zee] in
Starting state
2013-10-03 06:07:22,289 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(Job-Executor-8:job-92) Seq
Guys,
My lab took a hit this morning the air handler for my lab crapped out,
temp was over a 100 in the lab. Servers powering off or bouncing.
Cloudstack 4.0 is backup, but out of the 10 compute nodes (5 KVM, 5
Xenserver) the Xenserver nodes keep going into Alert or Connecting state.
Is
http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.0.0/root_admin/assignVirtualMachine.html
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Chris Sciarrino
chris.sciarr...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to assign a VM to another user through the cloudstack web
interface?
For example if I had a request
Also noticed Console Proxy VM stuck in staring state (runs on KVM node)
Curtis Old
Neustar, Inc. / Neustarlabs / Senior Research Engineer
46000 Center Oak Plaza Sterling, VA 20166
Office: +1.571.434.5384 Mobile: +1.540.532.2230 / curtis@neustar.biz
/ www.neustar.biz http://www.neustar.biz/
Okay thanks for confirming. I will submit a feature request for it, this
seems like something that should be available through the UI.
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com wrote:
you will need to do that using the api it is not possible to via UI as far
as I know.
Dear all,
We face a major problem after upgrading to 4.2.0. Mounting from KVM hosts
to secondary storage seems to fail, every time a new VM instance is
created, it will use up the / (root) partition of the KVM hosts instead.
Here is the df result:
root@hv-kvm-02:/home/indra# df
Filesystem
have you looked at storage over-provisioning settings ??
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Indra Pramana in...@sg.or.id wrote:
Dear all,
We face a major problem after upgrading to 4.2.0. Mounting from KVM hosts
to secondary storage seems to fail, every time a new VM instance is
created, it
Are you using the release artifacts, or your own 4.2 build?
When you rebooted the host, did the problem go away or come back the
same? You may want to look at 'virsh pool-list' to see if libvirt is
mounting/registering the secondary storage.
Is this happening on multiple hosts, the same way? You
Hi Peter,
The above class is in the vmware plugin, could you check if it is available
in the agent?
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 12:29 AM, Erdősi Péter f...@niif.hu wrote:
Dear,
I installed CS 4.2 from rpm packages to Centos 6.4.
Everything works fine, with install, and with configuration, but
Hi Marcus,
Good day to you, and thank you for your e-mail. See my reply inline.
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:29 AM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.comwrote:
Are you using the release artifacts, or your own 4.2 build?
[Indra:] We are using the release artifacts from below repo since we are
Hi Marcus and all,
I also find some strange and interesting error messages from the libvirt
logs:
http://pastebin.com/5ByfNpAf
Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
Cheers.
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 1:38 AM, Indra Pramana in...@sg.or.id wrote:
Hi Marcus,
Good day to you, and thank you
It sort of looks like the out of space triggered the issue. Libvirt shows
2013-10-03 15:38:57.414+: 2710: error : virCommandWait:2348 :
internal error Child process (/bin/umount
/mnt/5230667e-9c58-3ff6-983c-5fc2a72df669) unexpected exit status 32:
error writing /etc/mtab.tmp: No space left on
Hi Marcus,
It happens randomly, mounting fails, and then / gets filled. I suspect this
occurs when the mounting fails, any files which is supposed to be
transferred to the mount point (e.g. templates used to create VMs) will
fill-up the / partition of the KVM host instead. This doesn't happen in
Hi all,
We are currently using Cloudstack 4.1.0 managing XenServer 6.0.2 servers.
Since recently, I don't know what cause this to appear on our system but
went we create a template from a Instance the template (.vhd) is upload on
on the secondary storage (NFS) but in a subdirectory ex:
from
Can you check the permissions on the subdirectories?
Travis
On Oct 3, 2013, at 3:51 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote:
Hi all,
We are currently using Cloudstack 4.1.0 managing XenServer 6.0.2 servers.
Since recently, I don't know what cause this to appear on our system but
Can you check the permissions on the actual folders, 244 and 246 and see if
they differ or have different owners?
Travis
On Oct 3, 2013, at 4:06 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote:
root@s-184-VM:# ls -lh 244/*
-rw-rw-rw- 1 4294967294 4294967294 309 Oct 3 18:01
Did you patch the hosts recently? That is the likely cause. The
patched NFSSR.py that CloudStack copies to XS hosts can be overwritten
by some patches. Without the patched NFSSR.py, when secondary storage
is mounted it reverts to the default XenServer behavior of including an
extra directory
Hi Marcus,
Good day to you, and thank you for your e-mail.
We will try to do what you have suggested and will see if we can fix the
problem. I am looking into increasing the filesystem of the KVM hosts to
see if it can resolve the problem for now.
Thank you very much for your help!
Cheers.
Dear all,
After upgrading to 4.2.0, I tried to resize a data disk of a VM instance
from 20 GB to 60 GB, through the Cloudstack GUI. The UI reports that the
resize was successful, and that the data disk is now showing 60 GB instead
of 20 GB. However, when I check the actual disk on the VM, it
I just tested local storage qcow2 and CLVM resize on 4.2, they both worked.
Resize works like this:
1. Do sanity checks
2. Send resize command to the agent
3. Resize the disk/lun/file
4. Inform the VM instance that the disk has changed by making a
libvirt volBlockResize call (this is not fatal,
Hi,
Why do system VM's on XenServer in a Basic networking zone require a
link-local address AND a private IP from the management range?
Best regards,
David Comerford
Tel: +353 87 1238295
Email: davest...@gmail.com
Website: http://dave.ie
GPG key: http://gpg.dave.ie
David,
Link local is so that the management server can talk to them, and the private
(management) address is so they can talk to the management server.
The Virtual Router has no private address so the standard way that CloudStack
management servers talk to all system VMs is via link local.
Hi Marcus,
Good day to you, and thank you for your e-mail.
I have tried restarting the VM and even stop and start the VM, but after
logging in to the VM, I still see the hard drive's size as 20 GB instead of
60 GB.
I tried to check /var/log/libvirt/libvirtd.log file on the KVM host where
the VM
Oops, of course vmware is non redistributable, so maybe it is not there.
However, this class should only be used if your CS is configured with
premium=true. If you turn it off, it will default to the
NfsSecondaryStorageResource included in the distribution.
Strage,
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 7:09
Hey all,
I was wondering, I have some server offering that should just be used by
the administrator, so, is it possible to hide them from normal users?
I noticed that when I am creating a service offering there is a check-box
called public? So, I created some service offering that would be used
What primary storage are you using? Any errors in agent log?
On Oct 3, 2013 3:16 PM, Indra Pramana in...@sg.or.id wrote:
Hi Marcus,
Good day to you, and thank you for your e-mail.
I have tried restarting the VM and even stop and start the VM, but after
logging in to the VM, I still see the
Rafael, there is no way to filter offerings by the caller type, not even
in the DB.
Public attribute means that the offering is available to everyone in the
cloud; there is another alternative - offering can be domain specific. In
this case it can be used by all users from this domain/its
I'm trying to test getting cloudstack 4.1 to build some GRE tunnels between
zones.
I have two zones and a Xen server in each. I have sdn.ovs.controller set to
true and separate physical interfaces configured for management traffic and GRE
traffic.
When I deploy a VM in each zone I can see
Hi Laszlo,
Thanks for the information, however do You know, where can I change it?
(I installed it from rpm packages.)
This is a compile-stage setting, or can be made on my installed system
(if yes, can You tell where)?
Thanks:
Peter
2013.10.03. 23:41 keltezéssel, Laszlo Hornyak írta:
So are you saying in version 4.1 it is currently not working? WHat
version are the patches available in?
Any thoughts on how it will work between zones? E.g. Layer 2 over layer 3?
Should we assign the same Subnets to each zone?
--
Luca
On 4/10/13 11:19 AM, Nguyen Anh Tu ng.t...@gmail.com
Dear all,
After CloudStack upgrade to 4.2.0, the network speed to our VM instances is
very slow and seems to be limited to 2 Mbps for both ingress and egress
traffic for each instance. It seems that there's some network rate limiting
which didn't take effect on CloudStack version 4.1.1 or below,
Hi,
It can be possible in CS 4.2
http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html/Release_Notes/version-4.2.html#host-and-vm-enhancements
Thanks,
Punit Dambiwal
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 11:41 PM, Chris Sciarrino
chris.sciarr...@gmail.comwrote:
Okay thanks for confirming. I
2013/10/4 Luca Salvatore l...@ninefold.com
So are you saying in version 4.1 it is currently not working? WHat
version are the patches available in?
Yes, I'm working on sdnextensions branch, which are not merged to any
release branch.
Any thoughts on how it will work between zones? E.g.
What I mean is that, the GRE tunnel is build between the XenServers OVS.
The XenSevers would need public IPs between them for connectivity over the
L3 network. This is normal for GRE end points.
However the VMs inside the XenServer don't know anything about the GRE.
For it to be proper layer 2
38 matches
Mail list logo
