依次删除完虚机二级存储、主存储、主机、集群、pod后在删除zone的时候老是提示有关联的物理网络，不能删除，请问要怎么删除物理网络，应该到哪里删除
Suserpmcloud-agent??jakarta-commons-daemon-jsvccloud-agent
service cloud-agent start
Starting Cloud Agent: cloud-agent
cat: /var/run/cloud-agent.pid: No such file or directory
Management Server
4.1/4.2下是/var/log/cloudstack/agent/cloudstack-agent.err
在 2013年10月16日下午2:58，Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com写道：
/var/log/clu/agent/cloudstack-agent.err里面有什么日志么
2013/10/16 Sunsbin youxiany...@gmail.com
我在Suse系统中打rpm包，安装cloud-agent，强制安装jakarta-commons-daemon-jsvc包，启动cloud-agent，报错。
service
4.0.1??redhat??Suse/var/log/clu/agent/cloudstack-agent.err
-- --
??: Wei ZHOU;ustcweiz...@gmail.com;
: 2013??10??16??(??) 9:00
??: users-cnusers-cn@cloudstack.apache.org;
: Re: Cloud-agent
今天早上过来看，还是卡在这步，日志里也没有特别的。
在 2013-10-16 23:13:24，tanthalas tanthalas...@hotmail.com 写道：
系统需要注册登记一下ISO文件，多等一会就好，不是问题。
刘宇超 Richard Liu
发件人： Aslan.kyo
发送时间： 2013-10-16 21:39:34
收件人： users-cn
抄送：
主题： 注册ISO状态停留在Installing_ISO
在注册ISO的时候，下载能够完成，但是之后状态一直停留在Installing ISO。
lun从0开始，如果是第一个，填0即可。
2013-10-17
toudsf
发件人：evanitsharp evanitsh...@gmail.com
发送时间：2013-10-17 10:07
主题：Re: iscsi加入时报下面的错误，请各位高手帮忙指教一下！虚拟化软件用的是xen server
收件人：CloudStack社区users-cn@cloudstack.apache.org
抄送：
你LUN怎么填的？
evanitsharp
发件人： toudsf
发送时间： 2013-10-16 16:58
收件人： users-cn
主题：
On 16/10/13 7:17 AM, Bjoern Teipel bjoern.tei...@internetbrands.com
wrote:
Wow, all user@cloudstack mails got catched in my spam filter, so sorry
for the late response.
After tinkering the whole day I gave up using a tagged VLAN for the
storage traffic, seems not to work. It ignores the VID and
It would be nice, if there is an update on the Release Note section, for
upgrading procedure - since system VMs does not start after upgrade from
4.x to 4.2... I know there is bug documented, and should be fixed with
4.2.1.. ?
Best
On 16 October 2013 03:08, Carlos Reategui car...@reategui.com
Hi Adam,
I also run into the same issues with upgrade from 4.0.0 to 4.2, on test CS
installation, and was really pissed off, because of documentation is kind
of incomplete on the upgrade process, or at least really buggy.. but I
managed to resolve it for now !
1.
So if you want to try upgrade
Hi Guys !
Do you mean that Cloudstack 4.2 is not production ready ? Or is it the
upgrade procedure towards a cs 4.2 that is not production ready ?
Thanks for your responses.
Regards, Benoit.
2013/10/16 Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
Hi Adam,
I also run into the same issues with
On 16/10/13 12:23 PM, Bjoern Teipel bjoern.tei...@internetbrands.com
wrote:
Murali,
That would be great if you're right. But I'm now in a dead lock:
Adding new network offering including LB:
2013-10-15 23:34:50,920 WARN [network.element.VirtualRouterElement]
(catalina-exec-19:null) Virtual
Correct
On Oct 16, 2013 1:54 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
H Adam,
forgive me if I missed some important clue in your report. It seems to
me that it is the upgrade procedure that is not production ready, not
version 4.2. Am I right?
regards,
Daan
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013
David,
Would you mind posting the url for the update you reference? I'm looking
at the 4.2 view on buildacloud.com and the last update there was a month
ago. So I assume I'm looking in the wrong place.
Thanks,
Fred
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 2:07 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
And just
Hi,
while registering iso, registration is successful, but it is not ready for
use. after 20 to 30sec, it vanishes. I've added the http server in global
settings secstorage.allowed.internal.sites. still no luck.
both secodary and console system vms are running.
You'll need to look in the management-server.log on the cloudstack management
server or in the cloud.log at the ssvm (secondary storage VM). Instructions how
to login into the ssvm can be obtained from the documentation (ssh over the
local hypervisor)
In my cases the ssvm did not have enough
I've download a new system VM and used cloudstack-sysvmadm to try to stop
the old ones...
root@cloudstack:~# cloudstack-sysvmadm -d DB.ip.address -u cloud -p
dbpassword -a
Stopping and starting 1 secondary storage vm(s)...
ERROR: Failed to stop secondary storage vm with id 1
Done stopping and
Hi raj,
I had the exact problem, what I found was that outbound requests on port
80 were blocked in Secondary Storage VM(ssvm) so I installed a tomcat
server , hosted the template there and then it successfully got added. To
confirm that you have the same error , login to
I never intended to have support for password as I thought people will end
up using and storing plain text username/password, keys (specific for
cloudmonkey) are revokable :)
Maybe we can use usernames/password initially to create keys or maybe let
users decided what they want. If this could be
Passwords can be changed too. No difference in security, IMO.
Plus the api key option is always there.
In fact I first wrote it as an option ( --populate-api-keys USERNAME:PASSWORD),
but decided that it didn't buy anything.
The original code didn't pass pep8 (imports not being used etc),
I had to modify the iptables rules on the SSVM as outbound 80/443 were blocked,
I hadn't looked into whether or not this was done on purpose or if it was a
side-effect of something else.
-Jonathan
- Original Message -
From: Chirag Choudhary chirag200...@gmail.com
To:
Did you reboot the SSVM as well ? You might have to do this to take into
affect. Let me know if that resolves it for you.
On 16/10/13 6:22 AM, raj kumar rajkumar600...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
while registering iso, registration is successful, but it is not ready for
use. after 20 to 30sec, it
Open the database, and open vm-instances table, and just rename VM state
to Stopped (intead of Staritng, or Stoping, etc), then go back to UI, and
it will show as stopped. Simply delete it...
On 16 October 2013 19:45, Fred Messinger fredmessin...@gmail.com wrote:
I've download a new system VM
Hi
How is the nested visualization configured in the DevCloud appliance for
VirtualBox?
I have been trying to build my own DevCloud using Centos instead of Debian
with KVM as the hypervisor in the DevCloud, but it looks like VirtualBox
does not pass thru the Intel VMX flag to the Centos VM.
So
Hi,
According to some (possibly old) documentation I read, I have the
impression that it is *optional* to define a secondary storage IP subnet.
Note, my questions are all in the context of:
- CloudStack 4.2
- ESXi hosts / vSphere 5.1
- Primary Storage is VMFS via fiber channel
- Advanced
Fixed pep8 and other issues (with flake8).
Does this warrant a new release?
On 10/16/13 11:13 AM, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com
wrote:
Passwords can be changed too. No difference in security, IMO.
Plus the api key option is always there.
In fact I first wrote it as an option (
Hi Murali,
I saw your git commits. I want to compile now your changes into
our source code. Do i need just the one for 4.2 or also the
master commits:
Commit
4d07493a5e6e13462b80ba09c3535fa4af0ebdc7 in
updated subject with [SOLVED] tag
On 16-Oct-2013, at 10:48 AM, Daniel Hertanu d...@unixmob.com wrote:
I think I've seen a suggestion earlier about adding the world solved in
the subject whenever someone finds a solution for its problem.
So, regarding this management IP pool issue, I'm not
27 matches
Mail list logo
