This looks like a bug in 4.2.1. Can you elaborate more on the operation tried?
Were you trying to migrate a volume (data disk) that was detached from a
instance/vm to another storage pool?
Regards,
Devdeep
-Original Message-
From: Pierre-Luc Dion [mailto:pd...@cloudops.com]
Sent: Wedne
Also make sure that the compute offering you use for deploying a vm has
sufficient RAM and CPU to boot.
-Original Message-
From: motty cruz [mailto:motty.c...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 3:42 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: CS 4.2 KVM Centos 6.5 FreeBSD 64bit
+users
When ever we see the error 'Unable to contact resource', I suggest to check the
host agent logs (for xen /var/log/SMlog).
It will give you idea of what is going wrong from the router. Most of times
there could be script execution failures.
Adding command to clean up tags on xenserver
xe
Comments inline.
On 22-Jan-2014, at 3:48 am, motty cruz wrote:
> Thank you Lucian, but I tried FreeBSD 9.2 64bit and FreeBSD 10 64bit,
> either ISO did not worked for me.
I will try FreeBSD 10 + KVM later today and let you know. I can confirm that
FreeBSD 10 works wonderfully well on XenServer
Thank you Lucian, but I tried FreeBSD 9.2 64bit and FreeBSD 10 64bit,
either ISO did not worked for me.
thanks,
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Nux! wrote:
> On 21.01.2014 22:11, motty cruz wrote:
>
>> Hello, I'm trying to install FreeBSD 64bit 9.2 on guest instance on
>> CloudStack 4.2. I wa
On 21.01.2014 22:11, motty cruz wrote:
Hello, I'm trying to install FreeBSD 64bit 9.2 on guest instance on
CloudStack 4.2. I was able to successfully download the iso. Instance
gets
created boots from ISO but then it freezes.
I was able to successfully install default CentOS template, but not
Hello, I'm trying to install FreeBSD 64bit 9.2 on guest instance on
CloudStack 4.2. I was able to successfully download the iso. Instance gets
created boots from ISO but then it freezes.
I was able to successfully install default CentOS template, but not
instances other than the default CentOS, ca
We recently upgrade or Cloudstack from 4.1.0 to 4.2.1. hypervisor not
upgraded and using xenserver 6.0.2
Since then, we are unable to storage xenmotion Instance from a Primary
Storage to another. The pool is using local and shared storage and all kind
of storage xenmotion fail.
moving Instances e
Thx Matty! Appreciate your help!
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Marty Sweet [mailto:msweet@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. Januar 2014 17:15
An: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Betreff: Re: management server DB timeout
Hi,
>From the managment server point of view (as I see it), it wo
On 21-Jan-2014, at 8:35 pm, motty cruz wrote:
> Thank you, it clear out the confusing in my mind.
:)
--
@shankerbalan
M: +91 98860 60539 | O: +91 (80) 67935867
shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue
ShapeBlue Services India LLP, 22nd floor, Unit 2201A, World Trad
Hi,
>From the managment server point of view (as I see it), it would have to
stop all communication to Agents and the like if it wished to do that, as
the data would become inconsistent with other Management Servers. I would
imagine this is too much work to implement, but I'm sure one of the
devel
Hey Marty,
thx for your reply. I mean, in general the self-fence make sense but i was
looking for a way to say "try to reconnect for 60seconds".
Would be cool if you can paste your solution here!
Thx
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Marty Sweet [mailto:msweet@gmail.com]
Gesendet: D
Hi we just tested the upgrade from 3.0.7 to 4.2.1 in our test environment
While the upgrade went smooth we see a big issue with vm naming in vmware.
With cs 3.0.7 vm's where named like this:
"i-id-number-user_entered_vm_name"
(with global setting of vm.instancename.flag = true)
After the updat
Thank you, it clear out the confusing in my mind.
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Shanker Balan
wrote:
> Comments inline.
>
> On 20-Jan-2014, at 9:15 pm, motty cruz wrote:
>
> > Thanks again, I apologize for pushing this further but can I get by
> without
> > using bonding?
>
> What exactly ar
Hi,
I have this problem with my failover setup, I think however it's by design
to ensure data consistency and is more that the MySQL connections have
disappeared instead of it timing out.
I ended up creating a cron watchdog to start CS Management incase
it stopped, I'm sure there are more elegant
Comments inline.
On 20-Jan-2014, at 9:15 pm, motty cruz wrote:
> Thanks again, I apologize for pushing this further but can I get by without
> using bonding?
What exactly are you trying to "get by” here?
There are 4 traffic types in CloudStack - management, storage, guest and
public. So,
if y
Hey Guys,
just some short question. Is there a way to increase the DB timeout for the
management server?
I use mha for mysql master / slave automatic failover. Everything works but
everytime I perform a master failover and the virtual IP changes, the
management server shows me immediately t
On Jan 21, 2014, at 12:14 AM, Hollman Enciso R.
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Erik Weber wrote:
>
>> You could do it on transifex :-)
>>
>> https://www.transifex.com/projects/p/CloudStack_UI/
>>
>
> thanks
this might help:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=coVeK1QuIxM
>
>
> -
On 21-Jan-2014, at 3:22 pm, Peter Jönsson wrote:
> Well, I wrote that library so I’m using it. :)
>
> I will try to make that library more agnostic to packer, that the plugin will
> be in a more releasable state. We are testing a version of packer with
> cloudstack support internally at work. T
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:52:11AM +0100, Peter J??nsson wrote:
> Well, I wrote that library so I???m using it. :)
yup - i know, i started working off a fork of your lib when i started
couple months ago. will checkout your fork of packer too.
>
> I will try to make that library more agnostic to
Well, I wrote that library so I’m using it. :)
I will try to make that library more agnostic to packer, that the plugin will
be in a more releasable state. We are testing a version of packer with
cloudstack support internally at work. That moving target is here:
https://github.com/mindjiver/pac
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:29:35AM +0100, sebgoa wrote:
>
> On Jan 21, 2014, at 10:01 AM, Peter J?nsson wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > I have been working on adding support for Cloudstack in packer.io. This way
> > it is simple to create either new templates from scratch or update an
> > existing t
On Jan 21, 2014, at 10:01 AM, Peter Jönsson wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have been working on adding support for Cloudstack in packer.io. This way
> it is simple to create either new templates from scratch or update an
> existing template. For creating the initial template from scratch we have a
> cus
Hi!
I have been working on adding support for Cloudstack in packer.io. This way it
is simple to create either new templates from scratch or update an existing
template. For creating the initial template from scratch we have a custom iPXE
ISO that will fetch the iPXE-script via userdata, boot ke
24 matches
Mail list logo
