Hi Geoff,
Thanks for your support,
As you suggested I have disabled dynamically scalable option in my template
and stop/start the VM it is showing actual provisioning of RAM. as you
mention its a bug on ACS do you have any idea when will we have this bug
fixed ? as I understand the dynamically sc
Dear Abdul,
If you set mem.overprovisioning.factor != 1 in global settings，kvm agent will
set instance currentMemory half of memory in libvirt.
So you can edit /etc/cloudstack/agent/agent.properties and uncomment
"vm.memballoon.disable=true", and then restart kvm agent. When you { deploy new
Daan:
I am running it for at least 72 hours, though practice tells me the
vote period will be longer.
--David
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:05 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> David,
>
> Can you be lenient with the 72 hour schedule on this one? I don't
> think I personally can get to test this soon and w
yes I did try that..
- Original Message -
From: "Somesh Naidu"
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 4:38:13 PM
Subject: RE: Upgrade Problem
Have you tried destroying the VR?
-Original Message-
From: TommyBW [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent:
Hi Geoff,
thank you for your article. I'm trying to enable pool HA but ending up with
the following error message:
The restore could not be performed because this backup has been created by
a different (incompatible) product version
I have ACS 4.4.1-NONOSS_3 with XS 6.2 patched up to XS62ESP1013
Hi,
I have install cloudstack 4.4 everything is working fine but i cannot create
isolated networks.When i first configure cloudstack i didn't choose security
groups.Moreover when i register as a user i can create isolated networks(i
cannot delete them) and i cannot creaate instances.The log while t
Hi All,
Just wondering if anyone out there is using CS to provide customers with DR
services and how? Most of the commercial products out there that might
allow us to do so involve either some sort of SAN replication or else
direct access to the hypervisor hosts. Vision Solutions have an old pro
Hi Abdul,
This was something Len and I discussed a while back but I am still seeing
strange behaviour in my current 4.3.2 test system.
What I am seeing is that Windows VMs get 4x the RAM allocated to them on the
Hypervisor (XenServer) but the OS is also reporting 4x the RAM.
Linux VMs are gett
Thx Len for your suggestion. I am running kvm as a hypervisor I do remember
while I creating vm I used template which has dynamically scalable. may be
I will try creating new vm without using dynamically scalable option and
let you know.
Thx
AR.
On Jan 14, 2015 10:31 PM, "len.bellem...@alternativ
Rohit,
I don’t suppose you will be creating the el7 packages as well will you?
Adrian
-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 13 January 2015 07:37
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4
Hi Abdul,
Are you running XenServer with Dynamic Scaling enabled on your templates?
I had this issue and the only way to fix it was to disable the "Dynamically
Scalable" option on my templates, then shut down my vms (not restart) and then
bring them up again. After that they received all of
overprovisioning of RAM by factor 2...
On 14 January 2015 at 17:27, Abdul Rasool wrote:
> Hi,
>
> All the VM instances in ACS is showing half of the memory, actual provision
> to this particulate VM is 2GB but instance is showing only 1GB. could you
> please explain me why is this happening ?
>
Hi,
All the VM instances in ACS is showing half of the memory, actual provision
to this particulate VM is 2GB but instance is showing only 1GB. could you
please explain me why is this happening ?
free -m
total used free sharedbuffers cached
Mem: 986
Great, and please share your findings on this thread so anyone searching for
may benefit later etc
Regards
Geoff Higginbottom
D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
[email protected]
-Original Message-
From: Yuri Kogun [mailto:[email protected]]
S
Thank you, Geoff,
I will try this later this week.
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Xenserver pool HA in Cloudstack
> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:14:04 +
>
> Hi Yuri,
>
> To be totally honest, I
Hi Yuri,
To be totally honest, I've not tested upgrading XenServer once the Pool HA has
been enabled, but I would imagine you first disable the Pool HA, then proceed
with the upgrade, then re-enable HA at the end.
I would still set manage.xenserver.pool.master=false whilst upgrading the Pool
M
Have you tried destroying the VR?
-Original Message-
From: TommyBW [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 6:32 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Upgrade Problem
Hi All,
I have been doing an upgrade on my management server and there were a few
Hi Geoff
If the pool master is managed outside the cloudstack, does it mean that there
is no need to set manage.xenserver.pool.master=false when applying patched to
the Xen cluster with pool HA enabled ?
Will it just be enough to unmanage the cluster in cloudstack , disable the
pool HA on t
We had a similar problem before. It turned out to be a unsupported combination
of cloudstack + xenserver (we did run 4.2.1 with xenserver 6.2 sp1) . Please
check you have all required patches applied on the Xen box.
Best regards
Yuri
> From: cgei...@i
Tank you, Somesh
It has been running without any problems for a few days now. Will go ahead
with the production upgrade
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Root admin system capacity after upgrade to 4.3
> Da
Are there anyone help me ? Thanks a lot :).
Best Regards,
Star Guo
-邮件原件-
发件人: Star Guo [mailto:[email protected]]
发送时间: 2015年1月13日 15:28
收件人: [email protected]; [email protected]
主题: [CloudStack 4.4] About UI Images
Dear All,
I find some images in ui/images about CloudS
Thank you Rohit, I will follow this thread. It seems I can try it right away.
Good news.
Vadim.
-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 11:14 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: XenServer 6.5 released
Hi Vad
Hi Vadim,
While I'm yet to test XS 6.5 personally, it should work. There is an
on-going thread on the dev ML that may interest you:
http://markmail.org/thread/3xeoqxs2zzxvbktw
On Wednesday 14 January 2015 02:32 PM, Vadim Kimlaychuk wrote:
Hello all,
It seems there are no major dif
Hello all,
It seems there are no major differences at XAPI toolstack at XS 6.5
that uses CS to work with XenServer. Shouldn’t it be possible to use newely
released XS 6.5 right away? Or modification to CS is still needed?
Regards,
Vadim Kimlaychuk
David,
Can you be lenient with the 72 hour schedule on this one? I don't
think I personally can get to test this soon and we have two other
votes going on as well.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Marcus wrote:
> +1, ran some of the smoke tests that cover basic deployments of vm,
> vpc, and seve
25 matches
Mail list logo
