AW: How to set VirtualRouter hypervisor type?

Got the answer in another thread: setting system.vm.default.hypervisor=XenServer did the trick. Regards, Martin -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Martin Emrich [mailto:martin.emr...@empolis.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. Januar 2016 22:56 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org Betreff: How to set

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: upgrading 4.5.2 -> 4.6.0 virtualrouter upgrade timeout

Like I said, it’s already much better in 4.7.1. I start to see packages appearing, for example here: http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/centos7/4.7/oss/ With 4.7.1 we tested hundreds of rules and that worked fine. Regards, Remi On 28/01/16 17:24, "Martin Emrich" wrote:

Re: vRouter ping it's public ipaddress failed

Hi Frank,     Can you let me know from where did you tried to ping default GW ?   192.168.85.2, try the following tests:    If you are running on KVM, then go on HOST server and do # virsh console "name of virtual router",  login in with default credentials, and try to ping IP and GW from

Re: CloudStack and VMware VM deploy issue

Hi ilya,         Thanks to all for support, the issue was fixed ( both create template from ROOT Volume and Deploy VM from default template :         I found 3 Interfaces on SSVM, 2 with Private IP but from same class, in order to fix this i added a new class for storage networking on POD

Re: CloudStack and VMware VM deploy issue

See response in-line: On 1/28/16 5:11 AM, Cristian Ciobanu wrote: > Hello again, > > I found something strange. > > 1. i did the telnet test from SSVM with destination vCenter, not able > to ping also not able to connect via telnet on 80 >From SSVM log 2016-01-27 11:23:07,117

Re: cloudstack-agent 4.5 problem with cloudbr bridges

Hello Sebastian, Cloudstack creates a new bridge because it's standard behaviour if you mention a VLAN number when you add the public network details. I believe you can just skip mentioning the VLAN id when you add the public network, in which case it will just use the bridge you created

Re: İlt: Re: windows 2012 ethernet driver

Tolga, First please note the mailing list will delete any attachments, use a pastebin service instead. Secondly, have you installed on VirtIO devices when you prepared your template? Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - >

Workable environment

Hi all, Did anyone successfully create a fresh new installation of CloudStack 4.7? Could you tell me the environment you used? I tried CentOS 6.5/6.5/7.0 with Cloudstack 4.6&4.7, but every setup had problem. I'd like to try something proven workable first. Best regards, Rui Mao

Re: Workable environment

Rui, They all worked for me. The hardest bit to get right is the network, once you get a good understanding on that (in Cloudstack context) the rest is easy. Best thing you can do is install it the best you can, if you hit a problem come back here. Don't forget to send details of your problem

Re: Workable environment

Hi, Just my opinion. They a lot of bug on 4.6 and 4.7. They better way is stay with 4.5. But from what i see, this cloudstack is like "setup-and-forget". If you touch or upgrade it make life harder. - Regards, Mohd Zainal Abidin Rabani Technical Support ModernOne Data Solutions Sdn.

Re: Virtual Router volume migration

Hello Remi, Thanks, I will check your scripts. Right now I migrate in XenServer it self, after that update router's volume pool_id and path fields. Best regards, Martins On 2016.01.28. 11:22, Remi Bergsma wrote: Good morning, By default it cannot be done. I wrote a collection of scripts

Virtual Router volume migration

Hello, Is it possible to migrate Virtual Routers volume with storage migration from one storage to other, like it is possible with user volumes? Can't find such function.

Re: Virtual Router volume migration

Good morning, By default it cannot be done. I wrote a collection of scripts [1] that can do it. In the README, search for "Migrate a Virtual Router”. The script you need is [2]. Regards, Remi [1] https://github.com/schubergphilis/cloudstackOps [2]

Re: Virtual Router volume migration

Hi Martins, That also works indeed! I also need the database, but only read from it. Regards, Remi On 28/01/16 10:32, "Mārtiņš Jakubovičs" wrote: >Hello Remi, > >Thanks, I will check your scripts. Right now I migrate in XenServer it >self, after that update router's

(Self-Host) Unable to Add Host

CS 4.3 on Ubuntu 14.04. Using KVM as hypervisor. I'm trying to set up a simple self-hosted cloud. I am unable to add the management server as host on the admin UI.

AW: AW: upgrading 4.5.2 -> 4.6.0 virtualrouter upgrade timeout

Hi! To follow up: - I upgraded to 4.7.0 (there are no 4.7.1 el6 RPMs yet, neither from CloudStack nor from Shapeblue) - The problem still persists - It seems that VRs can be created on XenServer, but not on KVM. I tried forcing new VRs to XenServers only via host tags, but the decision to use

Re: AW: AW: upgrading 4.5.2 -> 4.6.0 virtualrouter upgrade timeout

Hi Martin, 4.7.1 has a fix for the overall timeout of 120 seconds. I expect the packages will be ready in a day or two. If XenServer works, try setting system.vm.default.hypervisor to XenServer and it will not use another hypervisor. Regards, Remi On 28/01/16 13:38, "Martin Emrich"

RE: CloudStack and VMware VM deploy issue

Hi Somesh,       I did the request test, and is not able to connect ( i did telnet text on port 80, 8080, 443 ) also is not responding to PING       I also did the same test from Management console ( CloudStack ) and works.       I'm not sure why is not working from SSVM because  i'm able to

RE: CloudStack and VMware VM deploy issue

Hello again,      I found something strange.      1. i did the telnet test from SSVM  with destination vCenter, not able to ping also not able to connect via telnet on 80      2. Restart SSVM PING and telnet vCenter, i was able to ping and connect via telnet      3. Again, PING test from SSVM

cloudstack-agent 4.5 problem with cloudbr bridges

Hi all, I have been working with cloudstack and vmware for more than 3 years, and now I would like to test it with KVM, but I have problems with the bridges names. Summarizing, when I add the KVM host on cloudstack, the cloudstack agent creates a new bridge a part of the cloudbr0 and cloudbr1

Re: (Self-Host) Unable to Add Host

Hi, Out of interest: why version 4.3? It’s rather old. I’d pick a newer version if you are building something new. Can the CloudStack management server SSH to the KVM hypervisor (172.16.134.94) with the supplied user/passwd? It needs to be root in 4.3. Regards, Remi On 28/01/16 10:51,

AW: AW: AW: upgrading 4.5.2 -> 4.6.0 virtualrouter upgrade timeout

Thanks, that's it. So (at least) I seem to have two issues: 1. VirtualRouters now fail to start on KVM (at least when there's already a VR on the KVM host) , but work on XenServer. 2. VirtualRouters take very long to start since 4.6: The VR I just started belongs to a network with some 20

AW: AW: AW: AW: upgrading 4.5.2 -> 4.6.0 virtualrouter upgrade timeout

This was/is 4.7.0. With the KVM problem: I suspect that the KVM hosts somehow got wonky, as the VR has no network connectivity (tried virsh console to it, and had no internet there). Next I'll try rebooting one. Another network (with 48 firewall/portforwarding rules) took ca. 30min, the first

RE: Failed to create templatecreate ( CloudStack 4.5.2 VMware 5.5 )

Hello,      The issue was fixed, i found 3 Interfaces on SSVM, 2 with Private IP but from same class, in order to fix this i added a new class for storage networking on POD level. Regards, Cristian On 28.01.2016 01:36:24, Somesh Naidu wrote: > Please see the full log

vRouter ping it's public ipaddress failed

Hi, all My cloudstack version is 4.6. public network: gw:192.168.85.2, netmask:255.255.255.0 vRouter: public ip:192.168.85.202 client ip: 10.1.1.1 link local ip:169.254.1.47 I type "route -n" in Vrouter, get folllowing: Destination Gateway